Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Telsee, 388 So. 2d 747.

32 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Wayne Ross La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Sanders 151 So. 3d 160 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Denna L. Decuir La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Decuir 61 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. JPF 32 So. 3d 1016 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. J.P. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. BS 10 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
in support of his argument.
State of Louisiana v. B. S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
in support of his argument.
State of Louisiana v. Randall C. Curtis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
On appeal, wherein the supreme court held that due process guarantees a defendant the right to rebut false information relied upon by the trial court in imposing sentence.
State v. Curtis 987 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
On appeal, wherein the supreme court held that due process guarantees a defendant the right to rebut false information relied upon by the trial court in imposing sentence.
State v. Lewis 926 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Pete 857 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
The Code of Criminal Procedure does not require a presentencing investigatory report prior to sentencing, and it certainly does not provide that defense counsel be present when a defendant is interviewed for such a the Supreme Court considered a case in which the defendant argued that he was adversely affected by presentencing information communicated privately to the judge, and the Court held that a defendant must have an opportunity to contradict or explain prejudicial information in a present
State v. Williams 778 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. DeGueurce 710 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Milstead 681 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Guzman 665 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State Ex Rel. Stepter v. Whitley 661 So. 2d 480 La. 1995
State v. Matthews 650 So. 2d 1170 La. 1995
State ex rel. Thomas v. State 647 So. 2d 1102 La. 1994
State v. Gibson 628 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Yates 574 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Coleman 574 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Greer 572 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Higginbotham 541 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
The court may consider information from a wide range of sources including prior court proceedings, the pre-sentence report, juvenile records, conversations with the victim, and submissions by the defense counsel.
State v. Herrington 512 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
See, for example, State v. Richardson, supra ; (La.App.
State v. Ourso 502 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Green 468 So. 2d 1344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Further, the court specifically noted that "[t]he trial judge's imposition of a sentence of forty years `at least half of which' shall be served without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence may be illegal as an indeterminate sentence in violation of C.Cr.P.
State v. Collinsworth 452 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Lathers 444 So. 2d 96 La. 1983
State v. Telsee 425 So. 2d 1251 La. 1983
Twice previously this court considered this case and remanded it to the trial court: first, to resentence the defendant after conducting a presentence hearing, and, second, for resentencing after stating for the record the considerations taken into account and the factual basis therefor in imposing sentence as required by La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Telsee 404 So. 2d 921 La. 1981
State v. Smith 404 So. 2d 210 La. 1981
See Justice Calogero's excellent discussion of the need for a