Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Packard, 389 So. 2d 56.

16 citing documents.

  • State v. Boyette 264 So. 3d 625 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
  • State v. Nicholas 51 So. 3d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    988 , 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974); cert.
  • State v. Cosie 44 So. 3d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    (“[s]ince no unusual circumstances are presented, the mother could exercise |8her common authority over the defendant’s bedroom.”).
  • State v. Thomas 981 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Sean A. Strange La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Consent is a well-recognized exception to the warrant requirement, and rendered lawful the subsequent discovery and seizure of the marijuana hidden behind the Thunderbird’s rear bumper.
  • State v. Strange 940 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Consent is a well-recognized exception to the warrant requirement, and rendered lawful the subsequent discovery and seizure of the marijuana hidden behind the Thunderbird's rear bumper.
  • State v. Cambre 902 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Strange 876 So. 2d 39 La. 2004
    Consent is a well-recognized exception to the warrant requirement, and rendered lawful the subsequent discovery and seizure of the marijuana hidden behind the Thunderbirds's rear bumper.
  • State v. Molette 798 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    988 , 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974); cert.
  • State v. Edwards 750 So. 2d 893 La. 1999
    988 , 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974); cert.
  • State v. Watkins 621 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Loyd 425 So. 2d 710 La. 1982
  • State v. Littleton 407 So. 2d 1208 La. 1981
    Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, supra
  • State v. Nicholas 397 So. 2d 1308 La. 1981
    2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
  • State v. Nieto 395 So. 2d 733 La. 1981
    2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
  • State v. Nieto 395 So. 2d 733 La. 1981
    2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)