Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Miller, 405 So. 2d 812.

31 citing documents.

In re Dauterive 251 So. 3d 1204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Succession of Miller , , 813 (La.
Blanton v. Napier 209 So. 3d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
O’Krepki v. O’Krepki, supra at 579; (La.
Succession of James Oliver Love La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
In the Louisiana Supreme Court found that where the donor expressed her unqualified intent on several occasions that the donee have money from the donor’s savings account, and where the donee withdrew the funds before the donor’s death in accordance with the donor’s wishes, there was a valid inter vivos do
Succession of Love 201 So. 3d 1027 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
O'Krepki v. O'Krepki 193 So. 3d 574 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
Succession of Harrison 183 So. 3d 579 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
In support of her argument, Ms. Speed relied upon Succession of Gorman, supra, as well as the more recent cases of and In re Succession of Gassiott, 2014-1019 (La.App.
Succession of Cecil Vanderbilt Gassiott La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Succession of Gassiott 159 So. 3d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Succession of Hunt 135 So. 3d 654 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Dastugue v. Fernan, 95-394 (La.App.5th Cir.10/18/95), .
Innovative Hospitality Systems, LLC v. Johnny Abraham La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Succession of 6 Walker, (La.
In Re Succession of Franklin 968 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
The court went on to point out that the legislature effectively overruled a 1981 case, which held that bearer bonds were incorporeal immovables not subject to being a manual gift with the result that the bonds were still part of the decedent's estate.
Thomson v. Thomson 778 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Mertens v. Mertens 688 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Tucker v. Fowler 668 So. 2d 718 La. 1996
Dastugue v. Fernan 662 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Arnold v. Fenno 652 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
The statute superseded in part (La.
In re Succession of Lawrence 650 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
The decision in illustrates the extent to which courts will go to enforce the clear will of the parties.
In Re Succession of Caraway 639 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Succession of Young 563 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
In the past our Supreme Court has held a donation of bearer bonds is a nullity unless accomplished through an authentic act
Succession of Diffey 543 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
They cite and Succession of Gorman, 209 La.
Succession of Daroca 536 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
In at 818, the Supreme Court held that funds from a savings account could be donated by manual gift as corporeal movables themselves, if there was an actual transfer.
Succession of Walker 533 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Succession of Hemelt 523 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Succession of Jones 505 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
[4] This act overruled the supreme court decision of (La.
Smith v. First Nat. Bank of DeRidder 478 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Succession of Velasquez-Bain 471 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Butler v. Reddick 431 So. 2d 396 La. 1983
The court of appeal relied on which it found could not be distinguished from the present case.
Succession of Amos 422 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Butler v. Reddick 416 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
But, as we understand the supreme court in donative intent may be established by testimony and circumstances similar to those here present.
Succession of Villere 411 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
of Miller, and as such its ownership is governed by the domicile of the owner and not by the location of the thing.
Doherty v. Baldwin 405 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981