DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc., 412 So. 2d 975.

19 citing documents.

  • Andermann v. Rouillier 271 So. 3d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc. , , 981 (La.
  • Marlon Littleton v. Saline Lakeshore, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    “‘Enclosed’ does not necessarily mean ‘fenced in.’” City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc.
  • Littleton v. Saline Lakeshore, LLC 178 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    “ ‘Enclosed’ does not necessarily mean ‘fenced in.’ ” City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc.
  • Borgnemouth Realty Co. v. Parish of St. Bernard 141 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See also City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc., (holding that Lake only overruled St.
  • Ricko Construction, Inc. v. Owen Dubois La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    “ ‘Enclosed’ does not necessarily mean ‘fenced in.’ ” City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc.
  • Ricko Construction, Inc. v. Dubois 57 So. 3d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    “ ‘Enclosed’ does not necessarily mean ‘fenced in.’ ” City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc.
  • Teresa Allen v. Glenn Edward Belgard, Et Ux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    More specifically, and from City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc., which discussed enclosures as follows: 4 In an action tried by the court without a jury, after the plaintiff has completed the presentation of his evidence, any party, without waiving his right to offer evidence in the event the motion is not granted, may move for a dismissal of the act
  • Allen v. Belgard 925 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    More specifically, the trial court quoted *1286 and from City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc., which discussed enclosures as follows: [W]hen a possessor does not have a title, his claim of possession is limited in extent to that property shown by enclosures (artificial or natural boundaries) and his possession must be proved `inch by inch' so that the possessor must establish actual, physical and cor
  • Pison, Inc. v. Jackson 633 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    When a possessor has no title, his possession must be proved "`inch by inch.'" citing City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc., (On Rehearing).
  • Boneno v. Lasseigne 589 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc., (emphasis added; some citations omitted).
  • Chevron USA Inc. v. Landry 558 So. 2d 242 La. 1990
    "`Enclosed' does not necessarily mean `fenced in.'" City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc., (La.
  • Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Landry 546 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    See also City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc., , on rehearing (La.1982).
  • Sellers v. Barthelemy 520 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc.
  • Todd v. State, Dept. of Natural Resources 474 So. 2d 430 La. 1985
    City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc., (La.
  • Verzwyvelt v. Armstrong-Ratterree, Inc. 463 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    Therein, the Court cited City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc., et al, for the proposition that: "When a possessor has a title, his exercise of possession over a part of the property constitutes the exercise of constructive possession of the whole; however, when a possessor does not have a title, his claim of possession is limited in extent to that property shown by enclosures
  • Todd v. State Through Dept. of Natural Res. 456 So. 2d 1340 La. 1984
    City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc., (La.
  • O'Quinn v. Haas Inv. Co., Inc. 458 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    As the Supreme Court said on rehearing in City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc., : What constitutes possession depends largely on the nature of the property.
  • Romar v. Estate of Gay 454 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    This burden of proof was addressed in City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc., et al., (On Rehearing), as follows: "When a possessor has a title, his exercise of possession over a part of the property constitutes the exercise of constructive possession of the whole; however, when a possessor does not have a title, his claim of possession is limited in extent to that property shown by enclosure
  • Chaney v. State Mineral Bd. 444 So. 2d 105 La. 1983
    In City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc., et al., at 982 (La.