DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dubroc v. Dubroc, 388 So. 2d 377.

123 citing documents.

  • State, Dept. of Social Serv. v. Coleman 616 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    This case analyzed both suits as based on the right that is the child's right
  • Broussard v. Broussard 617 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    App. 3d Cir.1981) writ denied
  • Ellefson v. Ellefson 616 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
  • Sillis v. Hernandez 608 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • Leger v. Leger 596 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    at page 380 (La.1980), sets out the law regarding extra-judicial agreements which modify court ordered child support.
  • Hendricks v. Hendricks 594 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • Cooper v. Cooper 594 So. 2d 939 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • Hawkins v. Hawkins 592 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
  • Kliebert v. Kliebert 590 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • LeFebvre v. LeFebvre 589 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    The court of appeal answered this question in the affirmative with the following rationale in Lachney, 399 So.2d at 734 -735: [3] We do not consider that the principles announced in Dubroc [ v. Dubroc, ], supra, are strictly limited to instances where parents have by bilateral agreement, which does not interrupt the child's maintenance or upbringing, stipulated for a suspension of child support payments.
  • Dix v. Dix 587 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • King v. King 566 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • Robinson v. Robinson 561 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • Lavergne v. Lavergne 556 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
  • Hogan v. Hogan 549 So. 2d 267 La. 1989
    1 M. Planiol, Civil Law Treatise, pt.
  • DeVillier v. DeVillier 543 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    The order of child support, which is dependent on custody [], likewise fell.
  • Carter v. Carter 544 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    : [A]n agreement by a parent to suspend his right to receive child support payments will not be enforced unless it meets the requisites for a conventional *566 obligation and fosters the continued support and upbringing of the child.
  • Mitchell v. Mitchell 543 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • Pennison v. Pennison 542 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
  • Abbott v. Dunlap 541 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    it is evident that the covenant between Dunlap and Abbott relative to child support was not adverse to the purpose and intent of child support as envisioned by the Civil Code.
  • Guidry v. Guidry 535 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    -379 (La.1980), the Louisiana Supreme Court commented on its decision in Hal-comb, supra, as follows: “In Halcomb we held that a husband could not unilaterally reduce his child support payments by a proportionate amount because one of several children has reached the age of majority.
  • Levy v. Levy 536 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • McDonald v. McDonald 520 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    modified its Halcomb, supra, decision.
  • Timm v. Timm 511 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • MacAluso v. MacAluso 509 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • Macaluso v. Macaluso 509 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • LeBlanc v. Cox 508 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • Clement v. Clement 506 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • O'BANNON FOR O'BANNON v. Azar 506 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • Distinguished LaBove v. LaBove 503 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • Foster v. Foster 499 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Boudreaux v. Harrington 496 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • Patrick v. Patrick 496 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Brantley v. Brantley 488 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    the Supreme Court held that an extra-judicial agreement between parents suspending child support payments may be enforceable under certain circumstances.
  • Roberts v. Roberts 474 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • Johnston v. Johnston 469 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    holds that conventional modifications of child support judgments are enforceable in some cases.
  • Aldredge v. Aldredge 465 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    2 *253 where our Supreme Court held that a Court may enforce an agreement between divorced parents to suspend the mother’s right to receive child support payments under a judgment while the father supports and maintains the child in his home if it is in the best interest of the child.
  • Jones v. Carter 464 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    that the Louisiana Civil Code does not mandate a lawsuit for a change in alimony and that oral agreements between the parties to suspend or reduce support are enforceable.
  • Hogan v. Hogan 465 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • Fouquet v. Fouquet 442 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
  • Dooley v. Dooley 443 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    The order of child support, which is dependent on custody [ ], likewise fell.
  • Bagby v. Dillon 434 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • Patel v. Moody 434 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • Flynn v. Flynn 434 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Stagg v. Stagg 436 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
  • Martin v. Martin 433 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • Vallaire v. Vallaire 433 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    In Dubroc v. *318 Dubroc, rehearing denied 1980, the court concluded the husband proved the wife had agreed to waive child support for one child for a period of time when the child resided with him.
  • Weatherspoon v. Weatherspoon 433 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    rehearing denied 1980; (La.App.
  • Lynn v. Lynn 430 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • Johnson v. Johnson 430 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    The test for judicial recognition of a (La.