Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Oliver, 387 So. 2d 1154.

18 citing documents.

State v. Powell 683 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Wheeler 644 So. 2d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Singleton 589 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Westmoreland 551 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Criticized State v. Smith 541 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Jackson has been criticized and' some limits have been placed on the Jackson cross-examination because of the danger of prejudice; on remand cert.
State v. Tassin 536 So. 2d 402 La. 1988
cautioned that the Jackson rule should be narrowly construed to avoid prejudice to the accused.
Criticized State v. Guillory 526 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Truitt 500 So. 2d 355 La. 1987
1981); see also State v. Brown, 371 So.2d *359 746 (La.1979)
State v. Caillouet 496 So. 2d 1312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Talbot, supra; State v. Martin, supra; State v. Oliver, [ ] supra; State v. Brown, supra
State v. Welcome 458 So. 2d 1235 La. 1984
State v. Savoie 448 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Anderson 440 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Neslo 433 So. 2d 73 La. 1983
15:495 and this court's jurisprudence on prior convictions impeachment
State v. Oliver 430 So. 2d 650 La. 1983
State v. Talbert 416 So. 2d 97 La. 1982
State v. Huizar 414 So. 2d 741 La. 1982
State v. Connor 403 So. 2d 678 La. 1981
noted severe criticism of Jackson, and held that: "Jackson must be narrowly, rather than broadly, construed and care must be taken to avoid prejudice to the rights of the accused by expansive references to details of a former conviction."
State v. Martin 400 So. 2d 1063 La. 1981