Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Landry, 388 So. 2d 699.
-
State of Louisiana v. Cortez De'Shun Hines
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
He also concedes that photos are generally admissible, if they shed “any light upon an issue in the case,” (La.
- State of Louisiana v. Trevor A. Matthews La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
- State of Louisiana Versus Teddy Chester La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
- State of Louisiana v. Corday Treveil Taylor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
-
State of Louisiana Versus John Spears
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
2419, 77 L.Ed.2d 1309 (1983); (La.
- State v. Allen 141 So. 3d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
-
State v. Joyner
107 So. 3d 675
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
(not reversible error to admit defendant’s pocket knife, where testimony was that murder weapon was a large "Buck” knife; coroner testified that victim died from a wound inflicted by a knife with a blade at least five to six inches long; no attempt was made to connect the pocket knife with the murder; an
- State v. Placide 109 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- State v. Collins 65 So. 3d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
-
State v. Declouet
52 So. 3d 89
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Kemp , 00-2228 at 7, 828 So.2d at 545 ( ce rt.
- State of Louisiana v. Larry J. Julian, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- State v. Julian 25 So. 3d 253 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- State of Louisiana v. Mason N. Godfrey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- State v. Godfrey 4 So. 3d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- State v. Burd 921 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
-
State v. Hopkins
908 So. 2d 1265
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Hendricks, 38,945 (La.App.
- State v. Crawford 848 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
- State v. Garrick 832 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
- State v. Kemp 828 So. 2d 540 La. 2002
- State v. Karam 834 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
- State v. Porter 806 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
-
State v. Gobert
780 So. 2d 616
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Reasoning in the following manner, the court found .no merit in the defendants’ argument: [RInitially, we note that “the late disclosure, as well as the non-disclosure of exculpatory evidence can so prejudice a defendant that he is deprived of his constitutional right to a fair trial....” cert.
- State v. Cosey 779 So. 2d 675 La. 2000
- State v. Anthony 776 So. 2d 376 La. 2000
- State v. Laymon 756 So. 2d 1160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- State v. Dubroc 755 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
- State v. Morrison 743 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- State v. Hampton 750 So. 2d 867 La. 1999
- State v. Lewis 736 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
- State v. Davis 732 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- State v. Green 735 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
- State v. Washington 716 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
- State v. Washington 716 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
- State v. Walter 695 So. 2d 1340 La. 1997
- State v. Gay 697 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
- State v. Pendelton 696 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
- State v. Henderson 684 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
- State v. Henton 682 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
- State v. Jasper 677 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
- State v. Mitchell 674 So. 2d 250 La. 1996
- State v. Sepulvado 672 So. 2d 158 La. 1996
- State v. Forrest 670 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
- State v. Harper 660 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
- State v. Williams 658 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
- State v. Kelson 646 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
- State v. Griffin 618 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
- State v. Perow 616 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
- State v. Hicks 607 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- State v. Smith 600 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- State v. Caston 583 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991