Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Spell, 399 So. 2d 551.

74 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Frederick Curtis Mangrum La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Brand, 2016 WL 7407414 at * 7 citing, ( La.
State Of Louisiana v. Jonathan Luper La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Brand, 2016 WL 7407414, at * 7 ( ( La.
State of Louisiana v. Frin Wayne Coward La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Farrier 162 So. 3d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Armstead 159 So. 3d 502 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Cobb 144 So. 3d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Hamdalla 126 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Patton 68 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Haik v. Allstate Insurance Co. 39 So. 3d 711 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
State v. Wallace, 2003-0193, p. 18 (La.App.
State v. Constance 25 So. 3d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Leonard 910 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Wallace 862 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
certiorari denied McIntyre v. Louisiana, 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct.
State v. Price 842 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Jackson 724 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
(citation omitted) : Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 844 requires a party to designate those errors which are to be urged on appeal.
State v. Ingram 688 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Pratt 671 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Galliano 655 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
844 and 920, , 605 n. 1 (La.1977), this court did not consider six additional arguments made by defendant in his appellate brief (under the headings of assignments one, two, four, five, six and eleven), which were neither properly designated assignments of error nor errors patent on t
State v. Duncan 648 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Galliano 639 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Caldwell 616 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Bullock 604 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
4th Cir.1989), writ denied
State v. Moseley 587 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Stanford 574 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Burrell 561 So. 2d 692 La. 1990
State v. Swayze 554 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
merely cumulative or corroborative of other testimony adduced at trial....” (La.
State v. Fleury 545 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Byrd 540 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Wells 538 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Bruno 526 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Art. 921; appeal *1290 after remand
State v. Smith 520 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Franklin 520 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Huddleston 517 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Thorne 503 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
An assignment of error appearing for the first time in a brief cannot be considered on appeal unless the matter falls into the category of an “error patent.” (La.App.
State v. Clark 499 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
certiorari denied McIntyre v. Louisiana, 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct.
State v. Burge 498 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Green 493 So. 2d 1178 La. 1986
8 Wigmore, Evidence, § 2294-2300; (Information given by the defendant to a fellow inmate assigned to the law library to help other prisoners was not covered by the privilege.).
State v. Jordan 489 So. 2d 994 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Jones 478 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Reynolds 473 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Square 468 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Brown 467 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Segura 464 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Guidry 461 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Sanford 465 So. 2d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Kelly 453 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Colvin 452 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Jackson 452 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Laddin 449 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Except for ‘patent error’, the reviewing court may consider only errors so designated, [citation omitted].”
State v. Duperon 448 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Jack 448 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Moreover, refused to address assignments of error not properly designated pursuant to Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 844.