Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sanders v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources, 388 So. 2d 768.

44 citing documents.

Monroe Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board v. Reginald Brown and the City of Monroe La. 2025
Civil service provisions “embrace the merit system, and their intent is to preclude favoritism,” with the goal of guaranteeing “the security and welfare of public service.” Sanders v. Dep’t of Health & Human Resources, (La.
Louisiana State Troopers Association, James O'Quinn v. State Police Commission La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
3d 43, 48, citing Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources, ( La.
Randall Kling v. Louisiana Department of Revenue La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Const. Art. X, § 1; Sanders v. Dep' t of Health and Human Res., ( La.
Woodrow Wilson Constr. LLC v. Orleans Parish Sch. Bd. 245 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
(citing Sanders v. Dep't of Health & Human Resources , , 770 (La.1980) ).
Harris v. Department of Police 125 So. 3d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources, (emphasis | Radded).
Banks v. New Orleans Aviation Bd. 989 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Reed v. Department of Police 967 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources, (emphasis added).
Marks v. New Orleans Police Dept. 943 So. 2d 1028 La. 2006
Bannister , 95-0404 at 5, 666 So.2d at 646 ; Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources
Marziale v. Department of Police 944 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
See also Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources
Hamilton v. Royal Intern. Petroleum Corp. 934 So. 2d 25 La. 2006
Sanders v. Dep't of Health & Human Resources
Carter v. Duhe 921 So. 2d 963 La. 2006
Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources, (using rules of statutory construction relative to legislation in general to interpret civil service rules).
Sanchez v. Georgia Gulf Corp. 853 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources, -771 (La.1980); (La.App.
Civil Serv. Com'n of No v. City of No 826 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Berry v. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR. 835 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
See Sanders v. Department of Health & Hospitals, (La.App.
Walker v. New Orleans Police Department 775 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
In Sanders v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources, the court had a similar problem involving a state Civil Service Rule which provided: The appointing authority shall furnish the director a copy of such statement within fifteen calendar days of the date the employee is notified.
Gorbaty v. Department of State Civil Service 762 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
at 190 , citing Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources
In Re Succession of Boyter 756 So. 2d 1122 La. 2000
See generally Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources, (explaining that whether procedural requirements such as those set forth in Civil Service Rule 12.3(a)(3) are mandatory cannot be determined by a mere literal reading of the provision, but can only be determined by ascertaining the intent of its drafters).
Christoffer v. Department of Fire 734 So. 2d 629 La. 1999
LA DEPT. OF AGRI. & FORESTRY v. Sumrall 728 So. 2d 1254 La. 1999
Const. art. X, § 1, et seq.; Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources
Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry v. Sumrall 728 So. 2d 1254 La. 1999
Const, art. X, § 1, et seq.; Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources
Bannister v. Dept. of Streets 666 So. 2d 641 La. 1996
Const. art. X, § 1, et seq.; Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources, Louisiana Civil Service League v. Forbes, 258 La.
Bannister v. Department of Streets 647 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
In considering this argument, we are guided by the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision in Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources
Truax v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections 640 So. 2d 1389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
3 *1392 The supreme court decision of Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources, makes it clear that not every rule violation rises to the level of a due process violation.
Casse v. Dept. of Health & Hospitals 597 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
LSAConst. Art. X, § 10(A)(4)
Marcantel v. Department of Transp. and Development 590 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources
Orleans Levee District v. Glenn 577 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Services
Gauthier v. GENERAL ACC. FIRE & LIFE ASSURANCE CORP. 573 So. 2d 462 La. 1991
See Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources, (La.
State v. Owens 561 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Explained Merritt v. Hathorn 537 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
First, we note the distinction drawn by the Louisiana Supreme Court between statutory requirements which are mandatory and those which are directory
Mott v. Department of State Civil Service 506 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
In Sanders v. Department Of Health & Human Resources, (La.
Eiswirth v. Eiswirth 500 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources, on remand, (La.App.
Bell v. Dept. of Health and Human Resources 483 So. 2d 945 La. 1986
Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources, (emphasis added).
Department of Corrections v. Pickens 468 So. 2d 1310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Lombas v. Department of Police 467 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
[2] They do not confer substantive rights
Sidney N. Collier Memorial Vocational-Technical School v. Caulfield 460 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
227 , (1954), which has since been overruled by Sanders v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources
Jack A. Parker & Assoc., Inc. v. STATE, ETC. 454 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
In Sanders v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources, the Supreme Court held that: "Civil service rules have the effect of law, La.
Appeal of Kennedy 442 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Shelton v. Southeastern Louisiana University 431 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources
Thoreson v. DEPT. OF ST. CIVIL SERVICE 433 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Sanders v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources
Picton v. Sewerage & Water Board 423 So. 2d 1284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
We find he was not prejudiced by the lack of notification, wherein the court found that the rule providing for notification to the Director was merely directory.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, ETC. v. Perry 423 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Sanders v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources
Broussard v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ETC. 405 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Concerning the first issue, our Supreme Court recently considered a similar *1222 matter in Sanders v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources
Sanders v. Dept. of Health and Human Resources 394 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources
Paisant v. University of New Orleans 391 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
However, a recent decision of the Louisiana Supreme Court in Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources, , held that the fifteen days notice requirement was not mandatory, but merely directory, and that a breach of the requirement did not invalidate an attempted discharge.