DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Douglas, 389 So. 2d 1263.

168 citing documents.

  • State v. Grillette 588 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Gene 587 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    State v. Goods, supra; State v. Hobdy, supra.
  • State v. Gene 587 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    State v. Goods, supra ; State v. Hobdy, supra .
  • State v. Torres 580 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Guy 575 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    NOTES [1] [2] At the hearing on the motions to supress, Officer Ward testified about the circumstances surrounding defendants' arrest, photographic lineup and physical lineup.
  • State v. Coleman 574 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Sneed 571 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Carter 570 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Rankin 563 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    315 (La.1982); , 1267 n. 2 (La.
  • State v. Smith 561 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Jones 560 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
    wherein a testifying policeman said that the defendant had recently been released from Angola, an unmistakable reference to at least one other crime.
  • State v. Edwards 552 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    ” We find the circumstances which led to defendant's arrest, as reflected by the record, pertinent and a source which may be considered by the sentencing court.
  • State v. Clark 547 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    He observed that the defendant was “graduating” to more serious crimes and that his previous time in the penitentiary had not “taught [him] a lesson.” The failure of the trial court to articulate all of the 894.1 guidelines is not fatal to the sentence if the record provides the appellate court with an adequate basis for review and constitutes adequate compliance with art. 894.1
  • State v. James 545 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Wright 535 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    Addressing the question of the imposition of the maximum sentence for armed robbery, : “This court does not lightly consider the matter of a 99-year sentence imposed without hope of release on parole.
  • State v. Bruno 526 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Smith 516 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Lambert 503 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Thorne 503 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Savoy 501 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Gaudin 493 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Gooden 490 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Robinson 490 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Isaac 487 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. McGuffey 486 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Washington 482 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Washington 482 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Lee 478 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Gordon 477 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    the Supreme Court upheld a 99 year sentence for armed robbery in a case where the trial judge did not specifically mention mitigating circumstances in his reasons for sentence, found that the defendant had an extensive record of prior convictions and was an incorrigable and violent criminal.
  • State v. Collier 474 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Pruitt 474 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Pruitt 474 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Johnson 474 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    Art. 894.1 is twofold: First, it is used to guide and assist the district courts in the exercise of the broad discretion which those courts have regarding the imposition of fair and proper sentences in criminal cases, and Second, to afford the reviewing court some insight into the trial court's reasoning process, so that the propriety of the sentence can be better evaluated
  • State v. Devillier 466 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    1982) and, second, to afford the reviewing court some insight into the trial court's reasoning process, so that the propriety of the sentence can be better evaluated.
  • State v. Fournier 465 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    State v. Kennedy, 444 So.2d at 306 ; (La.App.
  • State v. Smith 463 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Campbell 461 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    State v. Norman, supra .
  • State v. Dowden 461 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Smith 461 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Richard 457 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Richardson 459 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Gibson 458 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Taylor 454 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Jackson 454 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    This is not a situation where the witness had the opportunity to view the defendant on a number of occasions, over a long period of time, or at a close proximity
  • State v. Latiolais 453 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    in which a maximum sentence for armed robbery was imposed.
  • State v. Norman 448 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Nuccio 454 So. 2d 93 La. 1984
  • State v. Wilson 452 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Holmes 451 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Williams 452 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984