Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cangelosi v. SCHWEGMANN BROS., ETC., 390 So. 2d 196.

140 citing documents.

Tonubbee v. River Parishes Guide 702 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Moore v. Cabaniss 699 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Kosmitis v. Bailey, 28,585 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/20/96), .
Bell v. Rogers 698 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Guilbeaux v. Times of Acadiana, Inc. 693 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Landrum v. Board of Com'rs 685 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Statements that accuse a person of criminal conduct are defamatory per se, which generally relieves a plaintiff of the need to prove malice, (La.App.
Wisner v. Harvey 694 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
In so holding, in which the Louisiana Supreme Court ruled that statements made by and among the plaintiffs’ co-employee supervisors, in connection with a suspected altered check, did not constitute a publication to third persons.
Zellinger v. Amalgamated Clothing 683 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Christian v. Fontenot 672 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Joyner v. Wear 665 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Guillory v. State Farm Ins. Co. 662 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Guilbeaux v. Times of Acadiana, Inc. 661 So. 2d 1027 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Hebert v. Louisiana Ass'n of Rehabilitation Professionals, Inc. 653 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Roy v. Coco 649 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Henderson v. Richardson 649 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Saluto v. O'Leary 646 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
*1227 The trial judgé in finding the defamation claim was not covered by the policy.
Tarpley v. Colfax Chronicle 649 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Mr. Tarpley argues an accusation of criminal conduct has been recognized as defamatory per se; (1980); (La.App.
Crooms v. Lafayette Parish Government 628 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Cangelosi v. Schwegmann Bros., Etc., (La.App.
Sassone v. Elder 626 So. 2d 345 La. 1993
Borne v. New Orleans Health Care, Inc. 616 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Lee v. Woodley 615 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
App. 1st Cir.), writ denied (1981)
Hines v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. 613 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Rio Rouge Development Corp. v. Security First Nat. Bank 610 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
After referring to the elements for an action in defamation as delineated in Cangelosi v. Schwegmann Bros., Etc., the trial court concluded that there was no duty to defend because *176 plaintiffs "failed to allege the falsity of the so-called derogatory remarks."
Gugliuzza v. KCMC, INC. 606 So. 2d 790 La. 1992
Wright v. Dollar General Corp. 602 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Gugliuzza v. KCMC, INC. 593 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Neuberger, Coerver & Goins v. Times Picayune Pub. 597 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Fourcade v. City of Gretna 598 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
5th Cir.1989), writ denied
Kyle v. Civil Service Com'n 588 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Cangelosi v. Schwegmann Bros., Etc.
Usner v. Strobach 591 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Verneuil v. Poirier 589 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Melancon v. Hyatt Corp. 589 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Martin v. Lincoln General Hosp. 588 So. 2d 1329 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Borne v. New Orleans Health Care, Inc. 580 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Redmond v. McCool 582 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Miller-Douglas v. KILLER 579 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Williams v. Touro Infirmary 578 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Davis v. Southern Sav. Ass'n 557 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Miskell v. Ciervo 557 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Cangelosi v. Schwegmann Brothers Giant Super Markets, Inc.
Cortez v. Shirley 555 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Guaranty Income Life Insurance Co. v. Prepaid Dental Marketing Systems, Inc. 551 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Roberts v. Louisiana Bank & Trust Co. 550 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Leonard v. Smith 550 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Young Oil Co. of La., (La.App.
Henderson v. Guillory 546 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
210 Baronne Street Ltd. Partnership v. First National Bank of Commerce 543 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Johnfroe v. Children's Hosp. 537 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Bussie v. Lowenthal 535 So. 2d 378 La. 1988
A pure statement of opinion, which is based totally on the speaker's subjective view and which does not expressly state or imply the existence of underlying facts, usually will not be actionable in defamation That is because falsity is an indispensable element of any defamation claim, and a purely subjective statement can be neither true nor false.
Newton v. State, ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources, Office of Mental Health 536 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
EB Ludwig Steel Corp. v. CJ Waddell Contractors, Inc. 534 So. 2d 1364 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Matherne v. Response Instrument Service & Engineering Corp. 533 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Cangelosi v. Schwegmann Bros., Etc.
Beauchamp v. Eckerd's Drugs of Louisiana, Inc. 533 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988