Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fullilove, 389 So. 2d 1282.

59 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus C. T. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
  • State of Louisiana v. Marlon Frank Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Thomas 217 So. 3d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Monroe 198 So. 3d 259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    at pp. 4-5, 779 So.2d at 701 ( ).
  • State v. Smith 186 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    State v. Mitchell, 00-1399 (La.02/21/01), ; State v. Shed, 36,321 (La.
  • State v. Simms 143 So. 3d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    at pp. 4-5, 779 So.2d at 701 ( ).
  • State v. Robinson 79 So. 3d 1270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. White, 36,935 (La.App.2d Cir.6/6/03), , writ denied, 2003-2616 (La.5/14/04), , State v. Mitchell, 2000-1399 (La.2/21/01), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Paxton Jules Trahan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609, 85 S.Ct.
  • State v. Trahan 61 So. 3d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 , 85 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609, 85 S.Ct.
  • State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 , 85 S.Ct.
  • State v. Thomas 36 So. 3d 1178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Mitchell, 00- 1399 (La.2/21/01)
  • State of Louisiana v. Kendall Paul Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609, 85 S.Ct.
  • State v. Davis 36 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 , 85 S.Ct.
  • State v. Brown 968 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Lai 902 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    1229 , 14 L.Ed.2d 106 (1965) -1284 (La.1980); See also, State v. Mitchell, 00-1339 (La.2/21/01), .
  • State v. Packnett 892 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Mitchell, supra
  • State v. Bonner 895 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    1169 , 140 L.Ed.2d 179 (1998)]
  • State v. Loston 874 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State v. Cowart 862 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    1229 , 14 L.Ed.2d 106 (1965) -1284 (La.1980).
  • State v. Small 850 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 , 85 S.Ct.
  • State v. White 850 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 , 85 S.Ct.
  • State v. Shed 828 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Mitchell, 2000-13 (La.2/21/01)
  • State v. Shed 828 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Mitchell, 2000-13 (La.2/21/01)
  • State v. Ballay 800 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Mitchell, 2000-13 (La.2/21/01); ; ().
  • State v. Wright 796 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 , 85 S.Ct.
  • State v. Pendelton 783 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Mitchell 779 So. 2d 698 La. 2001
  • State v. Young 770 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Wesley 759 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Plaisance 745 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    in support of his argument for a mistrial based on the State's comment about the defendant's failure to testify.
  • State v. Hampton 750 So. 2d 867 La. 1999
  • State v. Arvie 709 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Brown 692 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    1 When *737 |3the prosecutor makes a direct reference to the defendant’s failure to take the stand, a mistrial shall be declared and “it is irrelevant whether the prosecutor intended for the jury to draw unfavorable inferences from defendant’s silence.”
  • State v. Colarte 688 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Bowman 677 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    the prosecutor stated: ...
  • State v. Rhodes 657 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Marine 648 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    1229 , 14 L.Edüd 106 (1965)
  • State v. Bourque 622 So. 2d 198 La. 1993
  • State v. Clay 612 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Moser 588 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Lamark 584 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    1229 , 14 L.Ed.2d 106 (1965)
  • State v. Slay 573 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Shepherd 566 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    While a direct prosecutorial reference to a defendant's failure to testify mandates a mistrial if requested, indirect comments command a remedy only if the remarks were intended to draw attention to a defendant not taking the stand.
  • State v. Robinson 563 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Allen 560 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Thomas 553 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Johnson 541 So. 2d 818 La. 1989
  • State v. Neidlinger 498 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Reed 483 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986