Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fullilove, 389 So. 2d 1282.
- State of Louisiana Versus C. T. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
- State of Louisiana v. Marlon Frank Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
- State v. Thomas 217 So. 3d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
State v. Monroe
198 So. 3d 259
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
at pp. 4-5, 779 So.2d at 701 ( ).
-
State v. Smith
186 So. 3d 703
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Mitchell, 00-1399 (La.02/21/01), ; State v. Shed, 36,321 (La.
-
State v. Simms
143 So. 3d 1258
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
at pp. 4-5, 779 So.2d at 701 ( ).
-
State v. Robinson
79 So. 3d 1270
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. White, 36,935 (La.App.2d Cir.6/6/03), , writ denied, 2003-2616 (La.5/14/04), , State v. Mitchell, 2000-1399 (La.2/21/01), .
-
State of Louisiana v. Paxton Jules Trahan
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609, 85 S.Ct.
-
State v. Trahan
61 So. 3d 794
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 , 85 S.Ct.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609, 85 S.Ct.
-
State v. Boyer
56 So. 3d 1119
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 , 85 S.Ct.
-
State v. Thomas
36 So. 3d 1178
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Mitchell, 00- 1399 (La.2/21/01)
-
State of Louisiana v. Kendall Paul Davis
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609, 85 S.Ct.
-
State v. Davis
36 So. 3d 351
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 , 85 S.Ct.
- State v. Brown 968 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
-
State v. Lai
902 So. 2d 550
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
1229 , 14 L.Ed.2d 106 (1965) -1284 (La.1980); See also, State v. Mitchell, 00-1339 (La.2/21/01), .
-
State v. Packnett
892 So. 2d 615
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Mitchell, supra
-
State v. Bonner
895 So. 2d 1
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
1169 , 140 L.Ed.2d 179 (1998)]
- State v. Loston 874 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
-
State v. Cowart
862 So. 2d 225
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
1229 , 14 L.Ed.2d 106 (1965) -1284 (La.1980).
-
State v. Small
850 So. 2d 1019
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 , 85 S.Ct.
-
State v. White
850 So. 2d 751
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 , 85 S.Ct.
-
State v. Shed
828 So. 2d 124
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Mitchell, 2000-13 (La.2/21/01)
-
State v. Shed
828 So. 2d 124
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Mitchell, 2000-13 (La.2/21/01)
-
State v. Ballay
800 So. 2d 953
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Mitchell, 2000-13 (La.2/21/01); ; ().
-
State v. Wright
796 So. 2d 850
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 , 85 S.Ct.
- State v. Pendelton 783 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
- State v. Mitchell 779 So. 2d 698 La. 2001
- State v. Young 770 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- State v. Wesley 759 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
-
State v. Plaisance
745 So. 2d 784
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
in support of his argument for a mistrial based on the State's comment about the defendant's failure to testify.
- State v. Hampton 750 So. 2d 867 La. 1999
- State v. Arvie 709 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
-
State v. Brown
692 So. 2d 735
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
1 When *737 |3the prosecutor makes a direct reference to the defendant’s failure to take the stand, a mistrial shall be declared and “it is irrelevant whether the prosecutor intended for the jury to draw unfavorable inferences from defendant’s silence.”
- State v. Colarte 688 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
-
State v. Bowman
677 So. 2d 1094
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
the prosecutor stated: ...
- State v. Rhodes 657 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
-
State v. Marine
648 So. 2d 1022
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
1229 , 14 L.Edüd 106 (1965)
- State v. Bourque 622 So. 2d 198 La. 1993
- State v. Clay 612 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
- State v. Moser 588 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
-
State v. Lamark
584 So. 2d 686
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
1229 , 14 L.Ed.2d 106 (1965)
- State v. Slay 573 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
-
State v. Shepherd
566 So. 2d 1127
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
While a direct prosecutorial reference to a defendant's failure to testify mandates a mistrial if requested, indirect comments command a remedy only if the remarks were intended to draw attention to a defendant not taking the stand.
- State v. Robinson 563 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Allen 560 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Thomas 553 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
- State v. Johnson 541 So. 2d 818 La. 1989
- State v. Neidlinger 498 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- State v. Reed 483 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986