Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Brown, 388 So. 2d 1151.

63 citing documents.

White v. Mitchell 426 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
In the court found Article 919 of the Civil Code to be unconstitutional, which had the effect of placing illegitimates on the same level with legitimate children in inheriting from their mutual parent.
Ailstock v. Hamiter 420 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
[4] wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the which had declared C.C.
IMC Exploration Co. v. Henderson 419 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
If she has proven by a preponderance of the evidence that her biological father is in fact Moody Henderson then under and Succession of Clivens, ___ So.2d ___ (La.1982), she is entitled to her proportionate share of the Successions of Martha and Charlie Henderson by virtue of her representation of her father provided this right has not prescribed, an issue which was raised but which we pretermit in view of our holding herei
In re Succession of Bissic 431 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
After trial, the trial court held that the decision in affirming (La.App.
Harlaux v. Harlaux 411 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
In sustaining the exception of no cause of action the trial judge held applied prospectively only, and that the one year grace period granted in Act 549 of the 1980 Regular Session was inapplicable.
Smith v. Stephens 412 So. 2d 570 La. 1982
As did both lower courts, we reject plaintiff's argument that this Court's opinion in (La.
Matter of Succession of Layssard 412 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
The sole issue on appeal is whether or not the trial court erred when it sustained a Motion for Summary Judgment on the grounds that there is no genuine issue of fact and that (1980) dictates prospective application allowing illegitimates the right to invalidate judgments of possession rendered prior to Brown, supra.
Villanueva v. Schwall 408 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Plaintiffs argue in the present suit that they are capable of inheriting in the succession of their father which was filed in the district court on June 21, 1960, (La.
Succession of Clivens 406 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Art. 919 despite the holding that this article was unconstitutional in (La.
In Re Wildeboer 406 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Smith v. Stephens 401 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
(1980) ; Rehearing denied October 24, 1980.
Succession of Ross 397 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
This article, however, was expressly declared unconstitutional by the Louisiana Supreme Court in the case of (La.
Succession of Richardson 396 So. 2d 1324 La. 1981
MARCUS, J., would grant to overrule (La.