Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bazley v. Tortorich, 397 So. 2d 475.
-
Reed v. Yor-Wil, Inc.
406 So. 2d 236
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
In our opinion, by the Louisiana Supreme Court is dispositive of the instant case.
-
Kirkpatrick v. City of New Orleans
405 So. 2d 562
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
However, this court’s decision in Bazley was subsequently reversed by the Supreme Court, and before oral argument plaintiff was ordered to reconsider her position.
-
Vascocu v. Singletary
404 So. 2d 301
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
The Louisiana Supreme Court, had occasion to discuss the element of "intent" in the context of intentional torts.
-
Mayer v. Blue Cross Ins. Co., Inc.
402 So. 2d 273
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
[3] Cases other than those mentioned in this opinion are referred to in Bazley v. Tortorich, La., .
-
Cortez v. Hooker Chemical and Plastics Corp.
402 So. 2d 249
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Pending this appeal, which reversed a (La.App.
-
Bazley v. Silverman
402 So. 2d 228
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
(1981), stated: “ * * * Several courts of appeal have stated the two prongs of the definition in the conjunctive, thus requiring a plaintiff to prove, in order to recover, that the defendant desired the physical results of his act in every case.
-
Woolridge v. Mouledoux
398 So. 2d 1272
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
the Supreme Court has determined an intentional act as: "* * * (W)e construe the legislation under review as providing that the exclusive remedy rule shall be inapplicable to intentional torts or offenses.
- Guinn v. Progress Drilling, Inc. 398 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
-
McDonald v. Boh Bros. Const. Co., Inc.
397 So. 2d 846
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
upholding the constitutionality of LSA-R.S.
-
Gonzales v. Kilgore
396 So. 2d 411
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
23:1032, meaning “intentional tort,” Bazley v. Tortorieh, La.1981, , to establish which it is necessary to show “that the co-employee ...
- Rennier v. Johnson 410 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981