DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Morrison, 392 So. 2d 1037.

25 citing documents.

  • State v. Shirley 10 So. 3d 224 La. 2009
  • State v. Davis 734 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    the court stated, “It is axiomatic that due process requires the state to prove every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” The defendant does not contest the validity of the remaining two predicates and the instant offense; therefore, we find sufficient evidence as to these offenses.
  • State v. Honeyman 545 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    32:663; State v. Rowell, supra.
  • State v. Buu Dinh Tran 542 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Lindsey 524 So. 2d 253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Rowell 517 So. 2d 799 La. 1988
  • State v. Bruce. 518 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • McWhiney v. State, Department of Public Safety 514 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Coleman 517 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    the defendant argued that the P.E.I.
  • State v. Rowell 505 So. 2d 978 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    State v. Morrison, [ ] supra; State v. Goetz, [ ] supra; State v. Graham, [ ] supra; ” Therefore, according to the dictates of Tanner , the State had the burden of proving the admissibility of the blood analysis.
  • State v. Bradley 504 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. St. Amant 504 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Bailey 500 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Fairleigh 490 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Taylor 483 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Landry 463 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Franklin 461 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Dangerfield 459 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Tanner 457 So. 2d 1172 La. 1984
  • State v. Tanner 446 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Dayton 445 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Doucet 443 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Green 418 So. 2d 609 La. 1982
    this Court reversed a drunk driving conviction because the blood test had been admitted without adequate evidence showing that the machine used to perform the test was regularly adjusted by a qualified technician.
  • State v. Gregory 403 So. 2d 1225 La. 1981
  • State v. Westbrook 392 So. 2d 1043 La. 1980
    handed down this date and decided under the new regulations.