DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Adams v. Adams, 389 So. 2d 381.

86 citing documents.

  • Helm v. Walker 477 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • Schwartz v. Schwartz 472 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    We conclude that for purposes of determining post-separation fault, reference must be made to both article 139 and 138, (La.
  • Derbes v. Derbes 462 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • Lamb v. Lamb 460 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • Edelen v. Edelen 457 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • Baham v. Baham 456 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
  • Jergins v. Jergins 451 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • Kaplan v. Kaplan 453 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • Conner v. Conner 449 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    In such instances, alimony penden-te lite may be allowed but permanent alimony shall not be allowed thereafter following divorce.” the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “fault” as used in Art. 141 meant fault such as would entitle either party to a separation from bed and board.
  • Schroeder v. Leitz 444 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • Watson v. Watson 442 So. 2d 1310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • Langton v. Langton 442 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • Jones v. Jones 442 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    Our Supreme Court considered the nature of "fault" sufficient *819 and succinctly summarized the law at pp. 382-383: Civil Code art. 160, dealing with alimony after a final divorce, requires freedom from fault on the part of the claimant spouse as one prerequisite to an award of alimony.
  • Slaughter v. Slaughter 436 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • Rumore v. Smith 430 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Hollins v. Hollins 428 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Firstley v. Firstley 427 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
  • Holmgren v. Kaigle 425 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Butts v. Morrison 426 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    the Louisiana Supreme Court approved this court’s determination that the phrase “mutually at fault” means that “the husband must have committed acts which would be grounds for a fault-based separation in favor of the wife and the wife must have committed acts which would be grounds for a fault-based separat
  • Schexnayder v. Schexnayder 424 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
  • Ryan v. Ryan 422 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
  • Credeur v. Credeur 423 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    determined that “fault” for purposes of permanent alimony preclusion is synonymous with the fault grounds for separation and divorce.
  • Rapp v. Rapp 420 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    In such instances, alimony pendente lite may be allowed but permanent alimony shall not be allowed thereafter following divorce.” (emphasis added) the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “fault” in Article 141 must be one of the eight fault-based grounds in Civil Code Article 138(1)-(8): “Separation from bed and board may be claimed reciprocally for the following causes: “1.
  • Mahlen v. Mahlen 420 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Honley v. Honley 416 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
    Further, concluded that "fault" for purposes of permanent alimony preclusion is only such conduct on the part of one spouse which would entitle the other spouse to a separation or divorce under LSA-C.C.
  • Harrington v. Campbell 413 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
  • Quinn v. Quinn 412 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
  • Boudreaux v. Boudreaux 407 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
  • Ebey v. Ebey 403 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • McKnight v. McKnight 401 So. 2d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Miller v. Miller 398 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
  • Bennett v. Deweese 398 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • O'Neal v. O'Neal 394 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    is sufficient to deprive the other spouse of alimony after a final divorce.” Adams v. Adams (La.1980), .
  • Favalora v. Favalora 391 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    In such instances, alimony pendente lite may be allowed but permanent alimony shall not be allowed thereafter following divorce.” , the Louisiana Supreme Court approved this Court’s prior conclusion that in order for a judgment of mutual fault to be granted, the husband must have committed acts which would be grounds for *967 a fault-based separation in favor of the wife and the wife must have committed acts which would be grounds for a fa
  • Oliver v. Oliver 393 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Adams v. Adams, La., (1980); (La.App.
  • Vail v. Vail 390 So. 2d 978 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980