DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williamson, 389 So. 2d 1328.

117 citing documents.

  • State v. Arvie 505 So. 2d 44 La. 1987
    [2] the judge instructed the jury on the essential elements of first and second degree murder as those crimes were defined under statutes which had been amended to redefine the crimes before the date of the charged crime.
  • State v. Green 482 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Green 469 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Simms 465 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Carter 463 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Nolen 461 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    fundamentally erroneous misstatements of the essential elements of the charged offense were found to require reversal, despite the defendant's failure to raise an objection in the trial court.
  • State v. Latiolais 453 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Thomas 427 So. 2d 428 La. 1983
    we allowed review of an erroneous jury instruction despite the defendant's failure to object at trial.
  • Distinguished State Ex Rel. Elaire v. Blackburn 424 So. 2d 246 La. 1982
    [15] in which the trial judge, with the concurrence of the prosecution and the defense, instructed the jury in accordance with the new law that did not become effective until a few days after the crime.
  • State v. Mart 419 So. 2d 1216 La. 1982
    fundamentally erroneous misstatements of the essential elements of the charged offense were found to require reversal, despite the defendant's failure to raise an objection in the trial court.
  • State v. Love 410 So. 2d 1045 La. 1982
  • State v. Belgard 410 So. 2d 720 La. 1982
    However, provided an important exception to that rule: ...
  • State v. MacK 403 So. 2d 8 La. 1981
    (exception carved out for jury charge which misdefines the crime with which defendant is charged).
  • State Ex Rel. Ross v. Blackburn 403 So. 2d 719 La. 1981
    Cf., Tyler v. Phelps, 622 F.2d 172 (5th Cir. 1980).
  • State v. Prestridge 399 So. 2d 564 La. 1981
  • State v. Tauzier 397 So. 2d 494 La. 1981
    and, that this question is more properly raised by application for a writ of habeas corpus.
  • Distinguished State v. Toomer 395 So. 2d 1320 La. 1981