Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Day, 391 So. 2d 1147.

46 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Deangelo Whitaker La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
1977), superseded by statute/ (La.
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Michael Vaccaro La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State v. Materre 53 So. 3d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Daniel Sibley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
When the facts in the record clearly support the sentencing choice, there is “little justification for a remand for resentencing when the record so plainly supports the sentence imposed.”
State v. Sibley 41 So. 3d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
When the facts in the record clearly support the sentencing choice, there is “little justification for a remand for resen-tencing when the record so plainly supports the sentence imposed.”
State v. MacK 981 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
[2] State v. Lovett, supra , was superseded by statute/
State v. Hill 552 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
” Following the reasoning of Crawford , we find that the trial court adequately made clear why the six and one-half year sentence was imposed.
State v. Jackson 523 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Bunch 510 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Brumfield 496 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Marks 472 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Further, we do not consider the sentence imposed to be in the higher range of the sentencing scale.
State v. Mosley 466 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Tuesno 456 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Rainwater 448 So. 2d 1387 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Jones 441 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Cressy 440 So. 2d 141 La. 1983
State v. Walters 440 So. 2d 115 La. 1983
State v. Moss 438 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Fontenot 438 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Lanclos, supra; (La.
State v. Capdeville 438 So. 2d 1310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Lanclos, supra; (La.
State v. Davis 438 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Everett 432 So. 2d 250 La. 1983
[6] This court generally does not remand for resentencing, despite lack of Article 894.1 compliance, when the record plainly supports the sentence imposed [ ] or if the sentence is not apparently severe [ (La.
State v. Thompson 429 So. 2d 862 La. 1983
State v. Vaughn 431 So. 2d 358 La. 1983
State v. Webster 427 So. 2d 1324 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. McDermitt, supra; State v. Cox, supra.
State v. Ruple 426 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Mitchell 421 So. 2d 851 La. 1982
State v. Willis 420 So. 2d 962 La. 1982
State v. Lewis 416 So. 2d 921 La. 1982
State v. Jones 412 So. 2d 1051 La. 1982
State v. Phillips 412 So. 2d 1036 La. 1982
State v. Crawford 410 So. 2d 1076 La. 1982
State v. Sugar 408 So. 2d 1329 La. 1982
State v. Sepulvado, supra.
State v. Washington 406 So. 2d 191 La. 1981
State v. Bourgeois 406 So. 2d 550 La. 1981
State v. Boatright 406 So. 2d 163 La. 1981
State v. Washington 406 So. 2d 191 La. 1981
State v. Telsee 404 So. 2d 921 La. 1981
State v. Prados 404 So. 2d 925 La. 1981
State v. Harvill 403 So. 2d 706 La. 1981
State v. Price 403 So. 2d 660 La. 1981
State v. Hicks 403 So. 2d 676 La. 1981
State v. Dison 396 So. 2d 1254 La. 1981
State v. Williams 396 So. 2d 296 La. 1981
State v. Toomer 395 So. 2d 1320 La. 1981
State v. Carey 392 So. 2d 443 La. 1981