Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Stramiello, 392 So. 2d 425.

32 citing documents.

State v. Desoto 968 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Jake C. Desoto La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Phillips 853 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Joseph 854 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Dunn 831 So. 2d 862 La. 2002
State v. Cosey 779 So. 2d 675 La. 2000
State v. Thomas 665 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
NOTES [1] Other cases where appellate review of erroneous jury instructions were refused due to the absence of a contemporaneous objection were: (1) an alleged erroneous definition of the crime of conviction, (2) an instruction allegedly containing a prohibited presumption, (3) an alleged erroneous instruction on the element of intent, State v. Walters, 25,587 (La.App.2d Cir. 1/19/94), ; and (4) an alleged erroneous instruction on reasonable doubt, St
State v. Sam 623 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
The holdings in these cases were diluted later by reference to several prior cases in which the court reviewed such instructions “as a whole ” to determine whether reasonable persons of ordinary intelligence would understand the definition of “reasonable doubt.”
Criticized State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Whitley 606 So. 2d 1292 La. 1992
we found an instruction using the phrase "grave uncertainty" in a reasonable doubt instruction was "neither erroneous nor prejudicial" when the charge was considered in its entirety.
State v. Salone 605 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Mosby 595 So. 2d 1135 La. 1992
State v. Vaughn, supra; C. Torcia, Wharton's Criminal Evidence § 134, at 575-77 (14th Ed.1985).
State v. Potter 591 So. 2d 1166 La. 1991
State v. Caston 561 So. 2d 941 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Burrell 561 So. 2d 692 La. 1990
Overruled State v. Cage 554 So. 2d 39 La. 1989
State v. Patrick 513 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Williams 492 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Miller 489 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Wallace 484 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Green 484 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Hardeman 467 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Sanders, supra.
State v. Jackson 450 So. 2d 621 La. 1984
289 , 70 L.Ed.2d 139 (1981)
State v. Price 447 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Freeman 447 So. 2d 1145 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Pelt 448 So. 2d 1294 La. 1984
State v. Moore 439 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
the charge to the jury defined "reasonable doubt" as one which would "give rise to a grave uncertainty", and in each case, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the charge was not erroneous or prejudicial.
Nolen v. Union Carbide Corp. 432 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
The Supreme Court of Louisiana, stated: “A trial judge’s determination regarding the relevancy of offered testimony is entitled to great weight and should not be overturned absent a clear abuse of discretion.” Here, there was no misuse of discretion in the three complained-of rulings.
State v. Vaughn 431 So. 2d 358 La. 1983
State v. Clayton 427 So. 2d 827 La. 1983
State v. Edwards 420 So. 2d 663 La. 1982
State Ex Rel. Ross v. Blackburn 403 So. 2d 719 La. 1981
State v. Bates 397 So. 2d 1331 La. 1981