Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc., 390 So. 2d 1272.
-
Heidi Rieth and Jason Bush v. Maria Munguia
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
App. 4 Cir. 5/14/04), ( and Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., )).
-
Mary Sanders v. New Orleans Aviation Board, Et Al.
La. 2024
Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
-
Lee v. Sapp
265 So. 3d 898
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Baker v. Payne & Keller of Louisiana, Inc. , , 1275 (La.
- Shehee v. Shehee 260 So. 3d 744 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
-
Harold Fils v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Insurance Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
ate of filing the original pleading.” “It is well established that Louisiana Code of 3 Civil Procedure Article 1153 permits amendment despite technical prescriptive bars where the original pleading gives fair notice of the general fact situation out of which the amended claim or defense arises.” Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Guillory v. City of New Orleans
224 So. 3d 1035
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
art. 1153 permits amendment despite technical prescriptive bars where the original pleading gives fair notice of the general fact situation out of which the amended claim arises.’ citing Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Watson v. Woldenberg Village, Inc.
203 So. 3d 317
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Baker v. Payne and Keller of La., Inc., (La.
-
Fred Bulliard v. the City of St. Martinville
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
1, 21 (1960); cf. Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., as discussed in n. 5, supra.
-
Bulliard v. City of St. Martinville
139 So. 3d 1269
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
1, 21 (1960); cf. Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., as discussed in n. 5, supra.
-
Roland Douglas Walet v. Southern Theatres Family Holding, LLC
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 5/16/12), (citing Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., ).
-
Walet v. Southern Theatres Family Holding, LLC
116 So. 3d 681
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 5/16/12), (citing Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., ).
-
Northa Lee Holmes v. Triad Hospitality D/B/A Clarion Hotel
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Holmes v. Triad Hospitality
89 So. 3d 532
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Manning v. PFG-Caro Foods
71 So. 3d 981
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Boquet Ex Rel. Billiot v. SWDI, LLC
992 So. 2d 1059
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Safety & Corrections, 03-1615, p. 6 (La.2/20/04), -49 , citing Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc., and Albert Tate, Jr., Amendment of Pleadings in Louisiana, 43 Tul.L.Rev.
-
Green v. Rice
948 So. 2d 376
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
See Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Kinchen v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co.
923 So. 2d 678
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
See also Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., where the court held that the amendment to a timely filed petition related back to the date the original pleading was filed.
-
Winford v. Conerly Corp.
897 So. 2d 560
La. 2005
Baker v. Payne & Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Joseph Leger v. Savoy Memorial Foundation, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc., Tate, J., Amendment of Pleadings in Louisiana, 43 Tul.
-
Smith v. Kaye's Food Market
874 So. 2d 395
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., Russland Enterprises, Inc. v. *399 City of Gretna, 98-676 (La.App.
-
De Atley v. Victoria's Secret Catalogue
876 So. 2d 112
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
citing Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Jackson v. Medical Transportation, Inc.
867 So. 2d 895
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Baker v. Payne & Keller of Louisiana, Inc., Tate, J., Amendment of.
-
Reese v. STATE DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
866 So. 2d 244
La. 2004
Baker v. Payne & *249 Keller of Louisiana, Inc., Tate, J., Amendment of Pleadings in Louisiana, 43 Tul.L.Rev.
-
Strouse v. M & M PROPERTIES
753 So. 2d 434
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., Russland Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Gretna, 98-676 (La.
-
Houston Industries, Inc. v. Fitch
752 So. 2d 974
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., Russland Enterprises, Inc., supra.
-
Russland Enterprises v. City of Gretna
727 So. 2d 1223
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
-
Rivard v. Petroleum Transport Co., Inc.
663 So. 2d 755
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
As explained by the Supreme Court in the case of Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc., the statement in Trahan was made in explaining why C.C.
-
Baker v. Conagra Broiler Co.
640 So. 2d 494
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Baker v. Payne and Keller of La., Inc., (La.
-
Scott v. Haley
632 So. 2d 793
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.
-
Hackman v. Southern Farm Bureau Ins. Co.
629 So. 2d 531
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
The Court in Gunter , quoting Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc., stated: It is well established that art. 1153 permits amendment despite technical prescriptive bars where the original pleading gives fair notice of the general fact situation out of which the amended claim arises.
-
Taylor v. Johnson
617 So. 2d 1213
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
3d Cir.1988); Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc., Amendment of Pleadings in Louisiana, 43 Tul.L.Rev.
-
Taylor v. Johnson
617 So. 2d 1209
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
3d Cir.1988); Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc., Amendment of Pleadings in Louisiana, 43 Tul.L.Rev.
-
Three Rivers Farm Supply, Inc. v. Webber
617 So. 2d 1220
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Baker v. Payne and Keller of La., Inc. (La.App.
-
Turnage v. Century Telephone Enterprises, Inc.
604 So. 2d 207
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
See also Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc.
-
Burrier v. Malmac Energy Corporation
592 So. 2d 1370
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Parker, Shewmake, cited supra; Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc., LRS 23:1061 has always included language to the effect that a principal [who is a statutory employer] is liable to the employee of his contractor as if the employee had been "immediately employed" by the statutory employer and that, in the appropriate circumstances, references in the law to the employer shal
-
Autrey v. Energy Corp. of America, Inc.
594 So. 2d 1354
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Co., Baker v. Payne & Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Parker v. Southern American Ins. Co.
590 So. 2d 55
La. 1991
Pearson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc.
-
Courmier-Trahan v. Service Cab Co., Inc.
546 So. 2d 513
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc.
-
Abercrombie v. VP PIERRET REALTY & CONST. CO.
532 So. 2d 212
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
See, Baker v. Payne & Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Comeaux v. Poindexter
527 So. 2d 1184
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Dodd v. Tucker
528 So. 2d 644
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.
-
Landry v. Thibaut
523 So. 2d 1370
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Esteve v. Iberia Parish Hosp.
520 So. 2d 848
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Baker v. Payne and Keller of La., Inc., Chenier v. Vanguard Party Sales, Inc., (La.App.
-
Randall v. Feducia
507 So. 2d 1237
La. 1987
Baker v. Payne & Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Illidge v. Southern American Insurance Co.
484 So. 2d 131
La. 1986
Case remanded to Court of Appeal for reconsideration in light of Ray v. Alexandria Mall, La., ; Baker v. Payne and Keller, La., ; Reeves v. Globe Indemnity, 185 La.
-
Vicknair v. Hibernia Bldg. Corp.
479 So. 2d 904
La. 1985
La.Civ.Code art. 2097 (current version at La.Civ.Code art. 1799); Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Stevens v. Charter Crude Oil Co.
470 So. 2d 535
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
-
Shewmake v. Alejaudro
466 So. 2d 711
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
The Louisiana Supreme Court in Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., stated that: ‘It is well established that Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 1153 permits amendment despite technical prescriptive bars where the original pleading gives fair notice of the general fact situation out of which the amended claim or defense arises.’ Therefore, Article 1153 mandates that
-
First Stake Insurance Com. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
464 So. 2d 782
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Louviere v. Shell Oil Company, supra
-
Mason v. Stauffer Chemical Co.
451 So. 2d 32
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
art. 1153; Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.