Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc., 390 So. 2d 1272.

64 citing documents.

  • Heidi Rieth and Jason Bush v. Maria Munguia La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
    App. 4 Cir. 5/14/04), ( and Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., )).
  • Mary Sanders v. New Orleans Aviation Board, Et Al. La. 2024
    Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
  • Lee v. Sapp 265 So. 3d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    Baker v. Payne & Keller of Louisiana, Inc. , , 1275 (La.
  • Shehee v. Shehee 260 So. 3d 744 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
  • Harold Fils v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    ate of filing the original pleading.” “It is well established that Louisiana Code of 3 Civil Procedure Article 1153 permits amendment despite technical prescriptive bars where the original pleading gives fair notice of the general fact situation out of which the amended claim or defense arises.” Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Guillory v. City of New Orleans 224 So. 3d 1035 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    art. 1153 permits amendment despite technical prescriptive bars where the original pleading gives fair notice of the general fact situation out of which the amended claim arises.’ citing Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Watson v. Woldenberg Village, Inc. 203 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Baker v. Payne and Keller of La., Inc., (La.
  • Fred Bulliard v. the City of St. Martinville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    1, 21 (1960); cf. Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., as discussed in n. 5, supra.
  • Bulliard v. City of St. Martinville 139 So. 3d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    1, 21 (1960); cf. Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., as discussed in n. 5, supra.
  • Roland Douglas Walet v. Southern Theatres Family Holding, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 5/16/12), (citing Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., ).
  • Walet v. Southern Theatres Family Holding, LLC 116 So. 3d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 5/16/12), (citing Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., ).
  • Northa Lee Holmes v. Triad Hospitality D/B/A Clarion Hotel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Holmes v. Triad Hospitality 89 So. 3d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Manning v. PFG-Caro Foods 71 So. 3d 981 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Boquet Ex Rel. Billiot v. SWDI, LLC 992 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Safety & Corrections, 03-1615, p. 6 (La.2/20/04), -49 , citing Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc., and Albert Tate, Jr., Amendment of Pleadings in Louisiana, 43 Tul.L.Rev.
  • Green v. Rice 948 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    See Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Kinchen v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. 923 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    See also Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., where the court held that the amendment to a timely filed petition related back to the date the original pleading was filed.
  • Winford v. Conerly Corp. 897 So. 2d 560 La. 2005
    Baker v. Payne & Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Joseph Leger v. Savoy Memorial Foundation, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc., Tate, J., Amendment of Pleadings in Louisiana, 43 Tul.
  • Smith v. Kaye's Food Market 874 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., Russland Enterprises, Inc. v. *399 City of Gretna, 98-676 (La.App.
  • De Atley v. Victoria's Secret Catalogue 876 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    citing Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Jackson v. Medical Transportation, Inc. 867 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Baker v. Payne & Keller of Louisiana, Inc., Tate, J., Amendment of.
  • Reese v. STATE DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY 866 So. 2d 244 La. 2004
    Baker v. Payne & *249 Keller of Louisiana, Inc., Tate, J., Amendment of Pleadings in Louisiana, 43 Tul.L.Rev.
  • Strouse v. M & M PROPERTIES 753 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., Russland Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Gretna, 98-676 (La.
  • Houston Industries, Inc. v. Fitch 752 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., Russland Enterprises, Inc., supra.
  • Russland Enterprises v. City of Gretna 727 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., (La.
  • Rivard v. Petroleum Transport Co., Inc. 663 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    As explained by the Supreme Court in the case of Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc., the statement in Trahan was made in explaining why C.C.
  • Baker v. Conagra Broiler Co. 640 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    Baker v. Payne and Keller of La., Inc., (La.
  • Scott v. Haley 632 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.
  • Hackman v. Southern Farm Bureau Ins. Co. 629 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
    The Court in Gunter , quoting Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc., stated: It is well established that art. 1153 permits amendment despite technical prescriptive bars where the original pleading gives fair notice of the general fact situation out of which the amended claim arises.
  • Taylor v. Johnson 617 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    3d Cir.1988); Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc., Amendment of Pleadings in Louisiana, 43 Tul.L.Rev.
  • Taylor v. Johnson 617 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    3d Cir.1988); Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc., Amendment of Pleadings in Louisiana, 43 Tul.L.Rev.
  • Three Rivers Farm Supply, Inc. v. Webber 617 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    Baker v. Payne and Keller of La., Inc. (La.App.
  • Turnage v. Century Telephone Enterprises, Inc. 604 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    See also Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc.
  • Burrier v. Malmac Energy Corporation 592 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    Parker, Shewmake, cited supra; Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc., LRS 23:1061 has always included language to the effect that a principal [who is a statutory employer] is liable to the employee of his contractor as if the employee had been "immediately employed" by the statutory employer and that, in the appropriate circumstances, references in the law to the employer shal
  • Autrey v. Energy Corp. of America, Inc. 594 So. 2d 1354 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    Co., Baker v. Payne & Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Parker v. Southern American Ins. Co. 590 So. 2d 55 La. 1991
    Pearson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc.
  • Courmier-Trahan v. Service Cab Co., Inc. 546 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    Baker v. Payne & Keller of La., Inc.
  • Abercrombie v. VP PIERRET REALTY & CONST. CO. 532 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    See, Baker v. Payne & Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Comeaux v. Poindexter 527 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Dodd v. Tucker 528 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.
  • Landry v. Thibaut 523 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Esteve v. Iberia Parish Hosp. 520 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    Baker v. Payne and Keller of La., Inc., Chenier v. Vanguard Party Sales, Inc., (La.App.
  • Randall v. Feducia 507 So. 2d 1237 La. 1987
    Baker v. Payne & Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Illidge v. Southern American Insurance Co. 484 So. 2d 131 La. 1986
    Case remanded to Court of Appeal for reconsideration in light of Ray v. Alexandria Mall, La., ; Baker v. Payne and Keller, La., ; Reeves v. Globe Indemnity, 185 La.
  • Vicknair v. Hibernia Bldg. Corp. 479 So. 2d 904 La. 1985
    La.Civ.Code art. 2097 (current version at La.Civ.Code art. 1799); Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Stevens v. Charter Crude Oil Co. 470 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc.
  • Shewmake v. Alejaudro 466 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., stated that: ‘It is well established that Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 1153 permits amendment despite technical prescriptive bars where the original pleading gives fair notice of the general fact situation out of which the amended claim or defense arises.’ Therefore, Article 1153 mandates that
  • First Stake Insurance Com. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 464 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Louviere v. Shell Oil Company, supra
  • Mason v. Stauffer Chemical Co. 451 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    art. 1153; Baker v. Payne and Keller of Louisiana, Inc., (La.App.