Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Allen v. Smith, 390 So. 2d 1300.

82 citing documents.

Dufour v. Dow Chemical Co. 119 So. 3d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Monte McWilliams v. Exxon Mobil Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Barnhill v. U.S., 11 F.3d 1360 (7th Cir.1993)
McWilliams v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 111 So. 3d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Barnhill v. U.S., 11 F.3d 1360 (7th Cir.1993)
Cassandra Chark v. Thompson Health Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Chark v. Thompson Health Services, Inc. 105 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Leah Lasseigne v. Gerald E. Landry, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Barnhill v. U.S., 11 F.3d 1360 (7th Cir. 1993)
Lasseigne v. Gerald E. Landry, L.L.C. 82 So. 3d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Barnhill v. U.S., 11 F.3d 1860 (7th Cir.1993)
Occidental Properties, Ltd. v. Reed 79 So. 3d 1135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Jones v. LSU/EA CONWAY MEDICAL CENTER 46 So. 3d 205 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
In Re: Medical Review Panel Jerome Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
In re Medical Review Panel Smith 23 So. 3d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Johnson v. Gonzales 5 So. 3d 1062 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
At Your Service Enterprises, Inc. v. Swope 4 So. 3d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
11/8/04), (dismissal after a 30 day extension from an order on a motion to compel); Horton v. McCary, 93-2315 (La.4/11/94), (dismissal after second hearing); (dismissal after a hearing and request for briefs); Raspanti, supra (dismissal after hearing and motion for contempt and sanctions); Medical Review Panel Proceedings of Peter v. Touro Infirmary, supra (dismissal after second hearing); Smith v. 4938 Prytania, Inc., 2004-0833 (La.App.
Schmolke v. Schmolke 986 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Martin v. Decker 985 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
See Giroir v. South Louisiana Medical Ctr., Division of Hospitals, , 1042 (La.1985); (La.
Munster v. Bill Watson Ford, Inc. 970 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
[6] L & M Hair Products, Inc. v. State, Dept. of Transp.
Raspanti v. Litchfield 946 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Nicholas Rozas v. Keith Montero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Rozas v. Montero 916 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
MEDICAL REV. PANEL PROC. v. Touro Infirmary 913 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Whelan v. New Orleans Opera Association/Travelers, 95-2541 (La.App.
Lane v. Kennan 901 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
the Louisiana Supreme Court declined to dismiss a suit with prejudice where the disobedient party's failure was not demonstrated to be willful, in bad faith, or through fault.
Smith v. 4938 Prytania, Inc. 895 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
the Louisiana Supreme Court considered the issue of whether the trial court judge abused his discretion in ordering the dismissal with prejudice of the plaintiff's *70 claim against a defendant.
Zavala v. ST. JOE BRICK WORKS, INC. 897 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
1 Cir. 12/22/00), ; see Benware, 99-1410 at p. 9, 752 So.2d at 847
Kenneth Trahan and Lisa A. Trahan v. State of La., Department of Health & Hospitals La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
In Re: Cynthia Wiley, Indiv. and on Behalf of Lillie M. Wiley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
In re Wiley 886 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Trahan v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Hospitals 886 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Accordingly, the judgment of dismissal is vacated, and the matter is remanded for an evidentiary hearing in accordance with Horton, , and Allen, .
Trahan v. STATE EX REL. DHH 886 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
In Re: Cynthia Wiley, Individually and on Behalf of Lillie M. Wiley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Counsel’s argument, which is all that is before us, is not evidence.16 10
In Re Wiley 862 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Jackson v. Buttattia 855 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Lirette v. Babin Farm, Inc. 843 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Tabor v. McDermott, Inc., (La.App.
Barber v. Ichaso 811 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Barnhill v. U.S., 11 F.3d 1360 (7th Cir.1993)
Renfroe v. State ex rel. Dept. of Transportation & Development 809 So. 2d 947 La. 2002
See Giroir, supra; Ray, supra; Tate, Amendment of Pleadings in Louisiana, 43 Tul.
Renfroe v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. 809 So. 2d 947 La. 2002
See Giroir, supra ; Ray, supra; (La.
Payne v. Green 769 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Benware v. Means 752 So. 2d 841 La. 2000
at 203 ; see also Barnhill v. United States, 11 F.3d 1360 (7th Cir.1993)
Case v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance 736 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Allen[ v. Smith], supra [ ,] at 1302; Magri, supra at 831 .
Sampson v. Dorfi 707 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
prejudiced to the extent that they have not been able to discover the necessary information to properly defend the claim against them.” the supreme court reversed the trial court’s dismissal of a suit for failure to comply with discovery.
Garza v. International Maintenance Corp. 702 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Helm v. Mervyn's Dept. Store 699 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
LeBlanc v. GMAC Financial Services 695 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Columbia Homestead Ass'n v. Arnoult
Whelan v. NEW ORLEANS OPERA 679 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Columbia Homestead Ass'n .
Rice v. Sagrera 657 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Horton, ; Barnhill v. U.S., 11 F.3d 1360 (7th Cir.1993); Magri, .
Creppel v. Tidewater Marine Service, Inc. 644 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that Rules 37(b) and (d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are identical to La.C.Civ.P.
Horton v. McCary 635 So. 2d 199 La. 1994
Barnhill v. U.S., 11 F.3d 1360 (7th Cir.1993)
Davis v. Byrd Memorial Hospital 628 So. 2d 1284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Joyce B., Inc. v. Village Plaza Partnership 625 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Moody v. Moody 622 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Horton v. McCrary 620 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993