Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. LaFleur, 391 So. 2d 445.

45 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Juan Dedilos Villarreal Gamboa La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
  • State v. Hamdalla 126 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Robinson 42 So. 3d 435 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    2525, 2541 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); (“There should be some indication that the trial judge tried to assess the defendant’s literacy, competency, understanding and volition before he accepted the waiver of counsel.”) (citation omitted).
  • State v. Robinson 23 So. 3d 926 La. 2009
    2525, 2541 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); ("There should be some indication that the trial judge tried to assess the defendant's literacy, competency, understanding and volition before he accepted the waiver of counsel.") (citation omitted).
  • State v. Robinson 23 So. 3d 926 La. 2009
    2525, 2541 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); (“There should be some indication that the trial judge tried to assess the defendant’s literacy, competency, understanding and volition before he accepted the waiver of counsel.”) (citation omitted).
  • State v. Pigford 935 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Batchelor 823 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Salinas 703 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Rivers 614 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    Judge Sexton stated that nothing in Faretta, supra, requires the trial judge to assess the defendant's literacy, competency, understanding, and volition when an apparently competent defendant enters an uncounseled guilty plea to a misdemeanor.
  • State v. Lawrence 600 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Strain 573 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Goodwin 551 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    2006, 2009-2010 , 32 L.Ed.2d 530 (1972); (La.
  • State v. Sepulvado 549 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    2006 , 32 L.Ed.2d 530 (1972)
  • State v. Lanoux 538 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Haley 538 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    the court concluded that before the judge can accept the defendant’s waiver of counsel, the record must evidence that the court determined the defendant’s literacy, competency, understanding and volition.
  • State v. Reed 536 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Bradley 535 So. 2d 1108 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    State v. Skeetoe, supra.
  • State v. Quintero 527 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Adams 526 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975)
  • State v. Carson 527 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Creamer 528 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Ayres 509 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975)
  • State v. Hammond 506 So. 2d 1380 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Dickson 505 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    2006, 2009 , 32 L.Ed.2d 530 (1972)
  • State v. Skeetoe 501 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    2006 , 32 L.Ed.2d 530 (1972); (La.
  • State v. Dupre 500 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Smith 479 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Johnson 473 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Hart 472 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    states, "[a]s in the case of a guilty plea, the record must demonstrate that the defendant was informed of the consequences of proceeding without counsel."
  • State v. Vampran 459 So. 2d 1333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State, City of Bossier City v. Walpole 459 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    is arguably the strongest precedent for the majority view.
  • State v. Nevels 457 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    2006 , *1256 2009, 32 L.Ed.2d 530 (1972)
  • State v. Thomas 434 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Quebedeaux 424 So. 2d 1009 La. 1982
  • State v. Bennett 407 So. 2d 683 La. 1981
    Also, this court found that since the defendant was unassisted by counsel, the judge’s failure to discuss the meaning of the plea and to inform the defendant of his right against self-incrimination were particularly serious error and for that reason reversed the conviction.
  • State v. McGinnis 413 So. 2d 1307 La. 1981
  • State v. Smith 407 So. 2d 652 La. 1981
    This court frowned upon use of a defendant's perjury as justification for a
  • State v. Halsell 403 So. 2d 688 La. 1981
  • State v. Smith 404 So. 2d 210 La. 1981
  • State v. Cusher 400 So. 2d 601 La. 1981
  • State v. Guiden 399 So. 2d 194 La. 1981
  • State v. Nicholas 397 So. 2d 1308 La. 1981
    : "It is now well established that a guilty plea is constitutionally valid only if the record clearly shows that the defendant was informed of his constitutional rights, including the right to jury trial, the right to confront accusers, and the privilege against self-incrimination, and then knowingly and volu
  • State v. Galliano 396 So. 2d 1288 La. 1981
  • City of Monroe v. Wyrick 393 So. 2d 1273 La. 1981
    this Court reversed a defendant's conviction where the record lacked any indication that the trial judge made an assessment of the factors listed in Faretta .
  • State v. Molinet 393 So. 2d 721 La. 1981
    State v. Sepulvado, supra