Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Martin, 400 So. 2d 1063.

72 citing documents.

  • State v. Benton 432 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Vallare 430 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    1981); State v. Douglas, supra."
  • State v. Williams 430 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Vaughn 431 So. 2d 358 La. 1983
  • State v. Roberts 427 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Goodman 427 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    1981); State v. Douglas, supra."
  • State v. Barrios 425 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
  • State v. Taylor 422 So. 2d 109 La. 1982
  • State v. Jett 419 So. 2d 844 La. 1982
  • State v. Lanclos 419 So. 2d 475 La. 1982
    State v. Douglas, supra .
  • State v. Sharpley 414 So. 2d 329 La. 1982
  • State v. Huizar 414 So. 2d 741 La. 1982
  • State v. Washington 414 So. 2d 313 La. 1982
  • State v. Washington 414 So. 2d 313 La. 1982
  • State v. Harris 414 So. 2d 325 La. 1982
  • State v. Robicheaux 412 So. 2d 1313 La. 1982
    This court has indicated, however, that a remand for more complete compliance with Article 894.1 is not necessary when the sentence imposed is not apparently severe, or where the record otherwise clearly illumines the sentencing choice, (On Rehearing).
  • State v. Walters 412 So. 2d 1388 La. 1982
  • State v. Green 409 So. 2d 563 La. 1982
    this court stated that where the sentencing requirements of LSA-C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Bolton 408 So. 2d 250 La. 1981
  • State v. Gray 404 So. 2d 1215 La. 1981
    art. 894.1 does not require that the sentence be set aside if the record otherwise clearly illumines his sentencing choice and demonstrates that the sentence is not arbitrary or excessive, , on rehearing our review for constitutional error cannot be precluded by a defendant's agreement to plead guilty or to receive a particular sentence.
  • State v. Bateman 404 So. 2d 927 La. 1981
    art. 894.1 does not require that the sentence be set aside if the record otherwise clearly illumines his sentencing choice and demonstrates that the sentence is not arbitrary or excessive, , on rehearing, (La.
  • State v. Spruell 403 So. 2d 63 La. 1981