Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bordelon v. Bordelon, 390 So. 2d 1325.
- Everett v. Everett 433 So. 2d 705 La. 1983
- Wade v. Wade 434 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- Ferry v. Ferry 433 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- Morgan v. Huddlestone 430 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- Walton v. Deblieux 428 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
Murphy v. Murphy
427 So. 2d 1278
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
the Supreme Court held: "This Court has clearly stated that in child custody cases, the procedure for appellate review is to give great weight to the determination of the trial judge, and to overturn a determination only when there is a clear abuse of discretion.
- Lambert v. Lambert 425 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Crooks v. Crooks 425 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
- Griffin v. Griffin 424 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
Seymour v. Seymour
423 So. 2d 770
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Cleeton v. Cleeton, on rehearing
- Parker v. Parker 424 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
-
Gilmore v. Williams
424 So. 2d 412
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
e served by changing her custody from her mother to her father who was “willing and able to provide for her with a Christian home, a stable environment, and a loving home.” The trial judge correctly recognized that the proper test to be applied in contests of this nature is “the best interest of the child.” La.Civil Code Art. 157
- Suire v. Jagneaux 422 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
-
Ohman v. Ohman
422 So. 2d 264
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
In discussing the appropriate standard of proof applicable to change of custody cases, said: “...
- State in Interest of Simolke 422 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
- Vincent v. Vincent 420 So. 2d 1333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Wallace v. Wallace 420 So. 2d 1326 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
- Jaubert v. Conforto 420 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Hill v. Hill 421 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Faust v. Faust 421 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
Wing v. Wing
418 So. 2d 720
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
“ the Supreme Court states that: “ ‘Thus, the best interest of the child, and not the possibility of harm, is the sole criterion applicable to change of custody cases.’ “Considering all of the factors which must be taken into consideration in deciding custody matters, and considering the evidence in this case
- Scott v. Scott 417 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
Babin v. Babin
417 So. 2d 495
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
on rehearing; Camelo, supra; Traylor, supra.
- Dardar v. Dardar 417 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
Billiot v. Billiot
415 So. 2d 552
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
laid down the appropriate test for appellate review after reviewing the legislative intent in the amendments to C.C.
- Goode v. Goode 415 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
- Montelbano v. Montelbano 415 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
- Cooley v. Cooley 411 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
-
Theriot v. Huval
413 So. 2d 337
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Cleeton v. Cleeton, on rehearing
-
Johnston v. McCullough
410 So. 2d 1105
La. 1982
a protracted child custody battle persisted between the divorced parents which originated when the mother, the custodial parent, allowed a man to live with her and the children.
-
Thomas v. Thom
408 So. 2d 442
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
The Supreme Court remanded the case to the district court " (La.
-
Noblit v. Noblit
407 So. 2d 1366
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "...
-
Hord v. Hord
407 So. 2d 1314
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Finally, defendant avers that the trial court failed to consider the "stability of environment"
-
Wright v. Wright
407 So. 2d 1298
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
3rd Cir. 1980); affirmed, Louisiana Supreme Court
-
Norkin v. Joseph
407 So. 2d 519
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
citing Fulco v. Fnlco, 259 La.
-
Stephens v. Stephens
407 So. 2d 475
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
permanent custody of the child or children shall be granted to the husband or the wife, in accordance with the best interest of the child or children, without any preference being given on the basis of the sex of the parent ....” as follows: “This Court has clearly stated that in child custody cases, the procedure for appellate review is to give great weight to the determination of the trial judge, and to overturn a determination only when there is a clear abuse of discretion.
- Ohman v. Ohman 405 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
-
Tusson v. Price
403 So. 2d 1265
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
1980, , and the sole criterion for determining custody (and, we add, visitation) is the best interest of the child, Bordelon v. Bordelon, La.1980, .
- Camelo v. Camelo 402 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Johnston v. McCullough 401 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
- Moreau v. Moreau 400 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Cooper v. Cooper 398 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
-
Butler v. Butler
397 So. 2d 32
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
The Supreme Court, set forth the sole criterion applicable to change of custody cases to be the best interest of the child.
-
Prattini v. Daughtry
396 So. 2d 447
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
interpreting the amended version of LSA-C.C.
- Lawson v. Lawson 396 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
-
Morrison v. Morrison
395 So. 2d 909
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
That the trial judge, diligently applied the applicable law in this custody determination is evidenced by his statement that “the best interest of the children is what’s to be considered.”
- Autrey v. Highbaugh 395 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Hadley v. Hadley 394 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
- Flournoy v. Flournoy 392 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
- Campbell v. Prejean 392 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980