Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bordelon v. Bordelon, 390 So. 2d 1325.

101 citing documents.

  • Everett v. Everett 433 So. 2d 705 La. 1983
  • Wade v. Wade 434 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • Ferry v. Ferry 433 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • Morgan v. Huddlestone 430 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • Walton v. Deblieux 428 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Murphy v. Murphy 427 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    the Supreme Court held: "This Court has clearly stated that in child custody cases, the procedure for appellate review is to give great weight to the determination of the trial judge, and to overturn a determination only when there is a clear abuse of discretion.
  • Lambert v. Lambert 425 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Crooks v. Crooks 425 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
  • Griffin v. Griffin 424 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Seymour v. Seymour 423 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    Cleeton v. Cleeton, on rehearing
  • Parker v. Parker 424 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
  • Gilmore v. Williams 424 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
    e served by changing her custody from her mother to her father who was “willing and able to provide for her with a Christian home, a stable environment, and a loving home.” The trial judge correctly recognized that the proper test to be applied in contests of this nature is “the best interest of the child.” La.Civil Code Art. 157
  • Suire v. Jagneaux 422 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
  • Ohman v. Ohman 422 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    In discussing the appropriate standard of proof applicable to change of custody cases, said: “...
  • State in Interest of Simolke 422 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
  • Vincent v. Vincent 420 So. 2d 1333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Wallace v. Wallace 420 So. 2d 1326 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
  • Jaubert v. Conforto 420 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Hill v. Hill 421 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Faust v. Faust 421 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Wing v. Wing 418 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    “ the Supreme Court states that: “ ‘Thus, the best interest of the child, and not the possibility of harm, is the sole criterion applicable to change of custody cases.’ “Considering all of the factors which must be taken into consideration in deciding custody matters, and considering the evidence in this case
  • Scott v. Scott 417 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Babin v. Babin 417 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    on rehearing; Camelo, supra; Traylor, supra.
  • Dardar v. Dardar 417 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Billiot v. Billiot 415 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    laid down the appropriate test for appellate review after reviewing the legislative intent in the amendments to C.C.
  • Goode v. Goode 415 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
  • Montelbano v. Montelbano 415 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
  • Cooley v. Cooley 411 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
  • Theriot v. Huval 413 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    Cleeton v. Cleeton, on rehearing
  • Johnston v. McCullough 410 So. 2d 1105 La. 1982
    a protracted child custody battle persisted between the divorced parents which originated when the mother, the custodial parent, allowed a man to live with her and the children.
  • Thomas v. Thom 408 So. 2d 442 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    The Supreme Court remanded the case to the district court " (La.
  • Noblit v. Noblit 407 So. 2d 1366 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "...
  • Hord v. Hord 407 So. 2d 1314 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    Finally, defendant avers that the trial court failed to consider the "stability of environment"
  • Wright v. Wright 407 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    3rd Cir. 1980); affirmed, Louisiana Supreme Court
  • Norkin v. Joseph 407 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    citing Fulco v. Fnlco, 259 La.
  • Stephens v. Stephens 407 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    permanent custody of the child or children shall be granted to the husband or the wife, in accordance with the best interest of the child or children, without any preference being given on the basis of the sex of the parent ....” as follows: “This Court has clearly stated that in child custody cases, the procedure for appellate review is to give great weight to the determination of the trial judge, and to overturn a determination only when there is a clear abuse of discretion.
  • Ohman v. Ohman 405 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Tusson v. Price 403 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    1980, , and the sole criterion for determining custody (and, we add, visitation) is the best interest of the child, Bordelon v. Bordelon, La.1980, .
  • Camelo v. Camelo 402 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Johnston v. McCullough 401 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
  • Moreau v. Moreau 400 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Cooper v. Cooper 398 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
  • Butler v. Butler 397 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    The Supreme Court, set forth the sole criterion applicable to change of custody cases to be the best interest of the child.
  • Prattini v. Daughtry 396 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    interpreting the amended version of LSA-C.C.
  • Lawson v. Lawson 396 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Morrison v. Morrison 395 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    That the trial judge, diligently applied the applicable law in this custody determination is evidenced by his statement that “the best interest of the children is what’s to be considered.”
  • Autrey v. Highbaugh 395 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Hadley v. Hadley 394 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
  • Flournoy v. Flournoy 392 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
  • Campbell v. Prejean 392 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980