Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Passman, 391 So. 2d 1140.

15 citing documents.

State v. Alexcee 262 So. 3d 949 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1985) (citing State v. Passman , , 1141 (La.
State v. Marchiafava 226 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Ferguson 176 So. 3d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In State v. Passman, [ ], this court interpreted the phrase “any duty lawfully required” to mean that before a public officer or employee can be charged with malfeasance in office, there must be a statute or provision of law which imposes an affirmative duty ■ upon him.
State v. Thompson 163 So. 3d 139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State of Louisiana v. Donald Cogswell, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Kelley, 241 La.
State v. Cogswell 918 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Kelley, 241 La.
State v. Espejel 867 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
*867 The requirement that there must be a
Gauthier v. Benson 667 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Deville 644 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
The duty must be expressly imposed by law upon the official because the official is entitled to know exactly what conduct is expected of him in his official capacity and what conduct will subject him to criminal charges.” at p. 741, citing
State v. Davis 634 So. 2d 1168 La. 1994
State v. Kelley, 241 La.
State v. Hessler 570 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Criticized State v. Perret 563 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
are "evidence" of vagueness.
State v. Perez 464 So. 2d 737 La. 1985
State v. Haltom 462 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Perez 450 So. 2d 1324 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
SCOPE OF REVIEW The Supreme Court of Louisiana, , (La., 1980) held that the trial court properly granted a motion to quash an indictment that charged the defendant with malfeasance.