Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ordonez, 395 So. 2d 778.

18 citing documents.

  • State v. Mark 109 So. 3d 368 La. 2013
    art. 712; State v. Reeves, 06-2419, p. 73 (La.5/5/09)
  • State of Louisiana v. D. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. D.T. 998 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    State v. Devenow, 253 La.
  • State v. DT 998 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    State v. Devenow, 253 La.
  • State v. Benoit 570 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Ned 525 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    In support of the above quoted statement, which held that it was not reversible error for the trial court to have refused the filing of a motion to suppress when a hearing was held outside the presence of the jury to determine the voluntariness of a statement and defendant made no showing of prejudice.
  • State v. Whittaker 479 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Patterson 464 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    ” While in custody at the Kenner Police Department, the defendant made additional statements which were admitted into evidence.
  • State v. Heath 447 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Johnson 442 So. 2d 1141 La. 1983
  • State v. Mitchell 437 So. 2d 264 La. 1983
  • State v. Knighton 436 So. 2d 1141 La. 1983
  • State v. Champion 412 So. 2d 1048 La. 1982
  • State v. Gaskin 412 So. 2d 1007 La. 1982
  • State v. Vaccaro 411 So. 2d 415 La. 1982
  • State v. Long 408 So. 2d 1221 La. 1982
  • State v. Bolton 408 So. 2d 250 La. 1981
    Miranda warnings were therefore not required
  • State v. Simpson 403 So. 2d 1214 La. 1981