Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. McCoy, 395 So. 2d 319.

24 citing documents.

State v. Ruiz 931 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
City of New Orleans v. White, 78 So.
State of Louisiana v. Gregory John Ruiz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
City of New Orleans v. White, 78 So.
State v. Shapiro 751 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
the court discussed the test on the constitutionality of a statute when the defendant is arguing a vagueness problem: Words used in statutes need not have the same precision as mathematical symbols.
State v. Caruso 733 So. 2d 1169 La. 1999
State v. Boyd 710 So. 2d 1074 La. 1998
State v. Giovengo 692 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
the court discussed the test on the constitutionality of a statute when the defendant is arguing a vagueness problem: Words used in statutes need not have the same precision as mathematical symbols.
State v. Powdrill 684 So. 2d 350 La. 1996
Const. art. 1 § 2; (reh'g denied).
State v. Cohen 549 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed a question of constitutionality of a statute where the defendant had asserted vagueness, stating: "Words used in statutes need not have the same precision as mathematical symbols.
State v. Lindsey 491 So. 2d 371 La. 1986
State v. Tuscano 492 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
City of New Orleans v. White, 78 So.
City of Bossier v. Gray 483 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
courthouses ...” (emphasis added) Rejecting this contention, the court stated: “The terms ‘obstruct’ and ‘unreasonably interfere’ plainly require no guessing at their meaning.” considered defendant’s assertion that La.R.S.
State v. Jones 481 So. 2d 598 La. 1986
Francis v. Franklin , above
State v. Bertrand 461 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
367 (1952); State v. Cannon, supra; (La.
State v. McKeel 452 So. 2d 1171 La. 1984
State v. Holmes 451 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. McKeel 443 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
367 (1952); State v. Cannon, supra
State v. Davis 430 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Overruled State v. Thompson 399 So. 2d 1161 La. 1981
State v. Williams 400 So. 2d 575 La. 1981
State v. Prestridge 399 So. 2d 564 La. 1981
367 (1952); State v. Cannon, supra; see also
State v. Brown 398 So. 2d 1381 La. 1981
has defined prima facie evidence as evidence sufficient to establish a given fact which if not rebutted or contradicted will remain sufficient.
State v. Taylor 396 So. 2d 1278 La. 1981
State v. Ross 404 So. 2d 440 La. 1981
State v. Gutter 393 So. 2d 700 La. 1981