Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Miller, 391 So. 2d 1159.

22 citing documents.

State v. Anthony 266 So. 3d 415 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Miller , , 1162-1163 (La.
State v. King 94 So. 3d 203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Ivory L. Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
However, in a later case, wherein the trial judge allowed the jurors to read the newspaper and watch television during defendant’s trial, the court noted that defendant did not assert that he had been prejudiced.
State v. Brown 943 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Nicholas v. Nicholas 923 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
at 1149; see also, Bordelon v. Safeway Ins.
State v. Robinson 874 So. 2d 66 La. 2004
State v. Martin 679 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Diaz 635 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Jordan v. Intercontinental Bulktank Corp. 621 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
the court stated that while an attorney may be a competent witness, the issue is not the admissibility of his testimony but the propriety of allowing him to assume the dual role of advocate and witness.
State v. Wilson 602 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
the Supreme Court found that a prosecuting attorney was a competent witness even in the dual role of prosecutor and witness.
State v. Maze 596 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
However, in a later case, (La.
State v. Floyd 544 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Prestridge, supra; State v. Kaufman, supra.
State v. Solid 529 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Bowman 491 So. 2d 1380 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Rowe 489 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Blunt 449 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Jackson 450 So. 2d 621 La. 1984
Deer Slayers v. LA. MOTEL AND INV. CORP. 434 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Jordan 420 So. 2d 420 La. 1982
State v. Edwards 419 So. 2d 881 La. 1982
State v. Tuesno 408 So. 2d 1269 La. 1982
State v. Penns 407 So. 2d 678 La. 1981