Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 370 So. 2d 202.

26 citing documents.

Morvant v. Shop Rite, Inc. 108 So. 3d 1287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Hervey J. Morvant v. Shop-Rite, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Trahan v. Savage Industries, Inc. 692 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., (La.App.
Ard v. Kraft, Inc. 540 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., (La.App.
Trahan v. Gerber Food Products, Inc. 520 So. 2d 956 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
599 , (1971); Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., (La.App.
Martin v. Henderson 505 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
1st Cir.1983) writ denied Hudgens v. Interstate Battery Systems of America, Inc., et al, supra; Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., et al, (La.App.
Levine v. Live Oak Masonic Housing, Inc. 491 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
3rd Cir., 1981); Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., (La.App.
Picolo v. Flex-A-Bed, Inc. 466 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Harris v. Atlanta Stove Works, Inc., (1st Cir.1983); (3rd Cir.1979), writ denied
Elmwood Plantation v. Ruud Water Heater Div. 435 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., (La.App.
Pawlak v. Brown 430 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
In Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., (La.App.
Jones v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. 430 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
3 Cir.1981); Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., (La.App.
Jones v. Lee Dautreuil Real Estate & Construction, Inc. 425 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., et al., (La.App.
Greer v. Ouachita Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 420 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
See Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Musemeche v. G & J Mobile Home Ser. & Supplies 425 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
3rd Cir.1979); Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., (La.App.
Wright v. Ouachita Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 415 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Boswell v. John Deere Co. 405 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
In Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., the Court quoted from the Weber case and addressed itself to the burden of proof in showing causation in a products liability suit.
Lokey v. Dixie Buick, Inc. 400 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
In Dixon Enterprises , additionally, this court stated: "We hold, moreover, that the present case is similar to the factual situation in Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., where a plaintiff made a redhibitory claim against the Alexandria Coca-Cola Bottling Company, Ltd., as manufacturer of a defective bottle of Coke and A & P as the seller.
Smith v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 399 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Co. of N. Y., supra; Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc., (La.App.
Philippe v. Browning Arms Co. 395 So. 2d 310 La. 1981
3rd Cir. 1975); Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., (La.App.
Hudgens v. INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS, ETC. 393 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., (La.App.
Dixon Enterprises, Inc. v. Restaurant Products, Inc. 389 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
We hold, moreover, that the present case is similar to the factual situation in Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., (La.App.
Hoychick v. Gulf States Toyota, Inc. 386 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
See also, Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc., (La.App.
Riche v. Krestview Mobile Homes, Inc. 375 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
art. 2545; Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., (La.
Harris v. Bardwell 373 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
See Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, (La.App.
Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 371 So. 2d 835 La. 1979
Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 372 So. 2d 568 La. 1979