Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Zurich Insurance Company v. Bouler, 198 So. 2d 129.
- Marguerite C. Slattery v. Ashley N. Holdsworth La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
- McNamara v. Augustino Bros., Inc. 13 So. 3d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- LeBlanc v. Babin 786 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
- Carbon v. Allstate Ins. Co. 719 So. 2d 437 La. 1998
- Mobley v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 674 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
- Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. 630 So. 2d 759 La. 1994
- Veillon v. US Fire Ins. Co. 590 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. Joe Dean Contr. 584 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Lindsey v. Poole 579 So. 2d 1145 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Benton v. Long Mfg. NC, Inc. 550 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- Rosinia v. Board of Trustees 526 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- Coates v. Northlake Oil Co., Inc. 499 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- Moreau v. Sanders 415 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
Marcum v. Inter-Ocean Insurance Co.
408 So. 2d 460
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
It is well settled that, in the interpretation of insurance contracts, any ambiguity is construed against the insurer who prepared the policy, (La.App.
-
Traders & General Insurance Co. v. Tillman
349 So. 2d 1370
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
the court, in discussing the law applicable to the interpretation of an insurance contract stated: “A contract of insurance should be given a fair, reasonable and sensible construction compatible with the apparent object and plain intention of the parties as expressed in the words of the agre
- Corkern v. MAIN INSURANCE COMPANY, CHICAGO, ILL. 268 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Roubion 252 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
-
Blanchard v. Hanover Insurance Company
250 So. 2d 484
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Zurich Insurance Company v. Bouler, La.App., .
- Hebert v. North British and Mercantile Insurance Co. 204 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968