Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Zurich Insurance Company v. Bouler, 198 So. 2d 129.

19 citing documents.

Marguerite C. Slattery v. Ashley N. Holdsworth La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
McNamara v. Augustino Bros., Inc. 13 So. 3d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
LeBlanc v. Babin 786 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Carbon v. Allstate Ins. Co. 719 So. 2d 437 La. 1998
Mobley v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 674 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. 630 So. 2d 759 La. 1994
Veillon v. US Fire Ins. Co. 590 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. Joe Dean Contr. 584 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Lindsey v. Poole 579 So. 2d 1145 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Benton v. Long Mfg. NC, Inc. 550 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Rosinia v. Board of Trustees 526 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Coates v. Northlake Oil Co., Inc. 499 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Moreau v. Sanders 415 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Marcum v. Inter-Ocean Insurance Co. 408 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
It is well settled that, in the interpretation of insurance contracts, any ambiguity is construed against the insurer who prepared the policy, (La.App.
Traders & General Insurance Co. v. Tillman 349 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
the court, in discussing the law applicable to the interpretation of an insurance contract stated: “A contract of insurance should be given a fair, reasonable and sensible construction compatible with the apparent object and plain intention of the parties as expressed in the words of the agre
Corkern v. MAIN INSURANCE COMPANY, CHICAGO, ILL. 268 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Roubion 252 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Blanchard v. Hanover Insurance Company 250 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Zurich Insurance Company v. Bouler, La.App., .
Hebert v. North British and Mercantile Insurance Co. 204 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968