Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Campbell v. Mouton, 373 So. 2d 237.

131 citing documents.

West v. Melancon 507 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
3rd Cir.1983), writ denied (La.App.
Howard v. Allstate Ins. Co. 510 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Brown v. Sears Roebuck & Co. 503 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
LeBleu v. Homelite Div. of Textron, Inc. 509 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Royer v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 502 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Tabor v. Doctors Memorial Hosp. 501 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Motions for a directed verdict and motions for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict generally are derived from the Federal law, and Louisiana derives its jurisprudential test for the circumstances under which these motions should be granted from Boeing Company v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.1969), (La.App.
Lewis v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. 499 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Louque v. Smith 499 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
aborated, in part, as follows: Motions for a directed verdict and motions for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict generally are derived from the Federal law, and Louisiana derives its jurisprudential test for the circumstances under which these motions should be granted from Boeing Company v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 865 (5th Cir.1969), (La.
Andrews v. Mosley Well Service 507 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Alumbaugh v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. 492 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
which quoted the following language of the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal in Boeing v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.1969):' `On motions for directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict the Court should consider all of *548 the evidencenot just that evidence which supports the non-mov
Labauve v. Central Mut. Ins. Co. 491 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
App. 3rd Cir.1982), we discussed the proper standard to be applied in deciding a (La.App.
Snow v. Gulf States Utilities Co. 492 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Daigle v. Coastal Marine, Inc. 482 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Scherer v. Chaisson 469 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
which quoted the following language of the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal in Boeing v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.1969): "On motions for directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict the Court should consider all of the evidence-not just that evidence which supports the non-mover's c
Blum v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 469 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
*1120 3rd Cir.1983), writ denied (La.App.
Green v. DeFelice 466 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER 5 The standard of proof which the trial judge is to use in deciding a (La.App.
Lizzana v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 468 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
1st Cir.1984); Rougeau v. Commercial Union Insurance Company, supra; (La.App.
Holmes v. State Through Dept. of Highways 466 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Gary v. Dyson Lumber & Supply Co., Inc. 465 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
O'Dowd v. Correa 464 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
(App. 3rd, 1979) appeal after remand , writ denied .
Quinn v. State, Through Dept. of Highways 464 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
The State contends that the correct standard for granting a (La.App.
Matranga v. Sara Mayo Hosp. 463 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Clark v. Laird 458 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
1st Cir. 1981); (La.App.
Arnone v. Illinois Cent. Gulf RR 461 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
In determining what the appropriate standard for directed verdicts was in Louisiana, (La.App.
Allen v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCES 456 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
For this proposition, (La.App.
Mott v. Babin Motors, Inc. 451 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Miguez v. Urban Developments, Inc. 451 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Schweiger v. Sanders 449 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Muse v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 449 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Courtney v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 447 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
As to the proper standard, that court pronounced and we adopt the following: "The standard for granting a directed verdict (Art. 1810(A) of the Louisiana Civil Code Procedure) (La.
Succession of Hodges 442 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
App. 3 Cir.1980); (La.App.
Reed v. Gulf Ins. Co. 436 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Dubois v. El Do Corp. 436 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
In jury trials, (La.App.
Theriot v. St. Martin Parish School Bd. 434 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Ubas v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 434 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Rougeau v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 432 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
which quoted the following language of the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal in Boeing v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.1969): `On motions for directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict the Court should consider all of the evidencenot just that evidence which supports the non-mover's c
Lasseigne v. Dauterive 433 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
*337 DIRECTED VERDICT The standard to be used in deciding whether a motion for directed verdict should be granted in a (La.App.
Battles v. Aderhold 430 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Jones v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. 430 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
A. & and Naquin v. Marquette Casualty Company, 244 La.
LeBlanc v. Wall 430 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Roberts v. St. Bernard Parish School Bd. 427 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
152, 157 (1977) (La.App.
Hinton v. Owensby & Kritikos, Inc. 425 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Cupit v. Grant 425 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
King v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 425 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Article 1810(A) (La.App.
Romano v. Lomasney 423 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Metro. New Orleans, Etc. v. Council, Etc. 423 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Carey v. Ory 421 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
With regard to the question of whether or not the trial court erred in granting a directed verdict in favor of the plaintiff on the issue of omnibus coverage, (La.App.
Chandler v. Fuqua 420 So. 2d 1348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Crowe v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 416 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Oppenheim v. Murray Henderson Undertaking Company, Inc. 414 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
The standard for granting a directed verdict (Art. 1810(A) of the Louisiana Civil Code of Civil Procedure) (La.App.