DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rocchi v. Schwabacher, 33 La. Ann. 1364.

8 citing documents.

  • Carpenter v. Skinner 71 So. 2d 133 La. 1954
    The information could not have been readily ascertained by ordinary inspection.- The cases of Rocchi v. Schwabacher & Hirsch, ; and Pike v. Kentwood Bank, 146 La.
  • Star Shoe Co. v. Hendricks 40 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    Ann. 491 ; ; Shultz v. Henderson, 134 La.
  • Wrenn v. Lafayette Furniture Co. 151 So. 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
    Ann. 491 ; Rocchi v. Schwabacher & Hirsch, ; Shultz Belting Co. v. Henderson Iron Works & Supply Co., 134 La.
  • William Whitman Co., Inc. v. Solomon 144 So. 292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
    Ann. 491 ; Rocchi v. Schwabacher & Hirsch, ; Shultz v. Henderson, 134 La.
  • Overruled Titche v. Hiller 5 La. App. 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
    Titche filed a four-page brief “in support of the exception of no cause of action”, and quoted Article 1847 of the Civil Code, and State vs. Dozier, ; 39 S. E. 593 , 2 Day (Conn.) qwi, 136, and 13 Wall.
  • Clevenger v. Mayer 3 La. App. 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
    279 , the organ of the court in the body of the opinion said: “The buyer in our judgment is without the right to a diminution of the price for any defect discoverable on simple inspection.” In the case of Rochi vs. Schwabacher & Hirsh, , (1368) the court quoted approvingly and applied the following doctrine laid down by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Slaughter’s Administrator vs. Gerson, 13 Wall.
  • McNeill & Higgins Co. v. Martin 107 So. 299 La. 1926
    * * * An inspection, trial, or test, to determine whether the goods are of the quality specified, must be made within a reasonable time, and the buyer is guilty of laches precluding rescission [or damages, ], if he delays making such inspection or test for an unreasonable time.” 35 Cyc.
  • Hossier Realty Co. v. Caddo Cotton Oil Co. 67 So. 20 La. 1914
    In such a case the buyer cannot impeach or be relieved from his contract.” The Court of Appeals cited Rocchi v. Schwabacher & Hireh, , where, as expressed in the syllabus, the following doctrine was enunciated: “In the sale of goods by merchants, who were not the manufacturers thereof, where there has been no deceit practiced, and where the means of knowledge were at hand and equally available for both parties, and the subject of purchase was alike