Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Darouse v. Mamon, 201 So. 2d 362.

20 citing documents.

Doctors for Women Medical Center, LLC, Craig M. Landwehr MD, LLC and Craig M. Landwehr, MD in his … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Dephillips v. Hosp. Serv. Dist. No. 1 of Tangipahoa Parish 255 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Robert H. Rhyne, Jr. v. Omni Energy Services Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Furthermore, an appeal in a proceeding that has previously been consolidated with another “does not serve as such to the benefit of another party in the joined action.” (La.App.
Rhyne v. Omni Energy Services Corp. 155 So. 3d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Furthermore, an appeal in a proceeding that has previously been consolidated with another “does not serve as such to the benefit of another party in the joined action.” (La.App.
Goldsmith v. Green 47 So. 3d 637 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Hudson v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections 682 So. 2d 1314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Little Ford, Inc. 506 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, Darouse v. Mamón, (La.App.
Galloway v. Ioppolo 464 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Distinguished US Fire Ins. Co. v. Swann 424 So. 2d 240 La. 1982
The cases upon which United States Fire relies, (La.App.
Howard v. Hercules-Gallion Co. 417 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
1st Cir. 1969); (La.App.
U. S. Fire Insurance v. Swann 411 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
1st Cir. 1969); (La.App.
McInnis-Peterson Chevrolet, Inc. v. Plain 391 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Darouse v. Mamon (La.App.
Marcotte v. Travelers Insurance Co. 236 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Darouse v. Mamon, La.App., .” As in the Voth case, the order of consolidation as well as the assignment for trial clearly reflects the separate identities of the four suits consolidated and a separate judgment was rendered in the instant suit.
Burke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 234 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Reed v. Pittman 229 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
in Darouse v. Mamon, La.App., it was held that consolidation of actions is merely a procedural convenience designed to avoid a multiplicity of actions, and in Voth v. American Home Assurance *458 Company, La.App., it was said: “The consolidation of cases (C.C.P.
Reed v. Pittman 224 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
While we are aware of the decisions in Darouse v. Mamon, La.App., ; Stephney v. Robertson, La.App., ; and Voth v. American Home Assurance Company, La.App., , holding that ordinarily consolidation of cases for trial is a procedural convenience and ordinarily does not merge the actions, we are not prepared at this time for lack of sufficient information to de
Pittman Construction Co. v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance 224 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
ompany, agrees with the facts set forth in appellant’s brief and prays that the judgment appealed from be affirmed; but Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company particularly calls our attention to the fact that it is not a party to the case (our No. 3544) consolidated herewith and that anything done by the parties in that action has no effect on this action, citing Darouse v. Mamon, La.App., ; Stephney v. Robertson, La.App., and Voth v. American Home Assurance Company, La.App., , to the gen
Voth v. American Home Assurance Co. 219 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Darouse v. Mamon, La.App., .
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Mamon 201 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
For the reasons this day handed down in Darouse, et al. v. Mamon, et al., Number 7168, on the docket of this Court, , the answer filed by Andrew Mamón to the appeal herein taken by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company is rejected and dismissed at said Mamon’s cost.