State ex rel. Coony v. Clerk of the Sixth Court
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., April 9, 1980 383 So. 2d 1308; La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., July 17, 1979 373 So. 2d 787; La. Ct. App. 4th Cir., January 13, 1976 325 So. 2d 848; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 19, 1967 205 So. 2d 485
State ex rel. Coony v. Clerk of the Sixth Court, 1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 218 (La. 1880).
Opinion text
Spencer, J. It was not for the clerk to decide what was the effect of the judge omitting or neglecting to pass upon the objection. His duty was to transcribe all the ‘ ‘ documents filed ’ ’ in the cause, and it will be for us to determine when the case comes here, what is, and what is not evidence. The decision in Marchand v. Coffee, 23 Ann. 442, is not in point — at least it contains nothing contrary to our present ruling. Writ refused.