DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Marpco, Inc. v. South States Pipe & Supply, 377 So. 2d 525.

20 citing documents.

  • Elaine Mitchell v. Alliance Compressors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    In her appellant brief, Mitchell asserts that the “WCJ was itching to grant defendant’s motion for summary judgment [, a]nd, in doing so, he deprived plaintiff of her day in court, which was only 35 days away.” Citing this court’s decision in 5 Marpco, Inc. v. S. States Pipe & Supply, (La.App.
  • Mitchell v. Alliance Compressors 269 So. 3d 977 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    Citing this court's decision in Marpco, Inc. v. S. States Pipe & Supply , , 528 (La.App.
  • Anthony Joseph Cannata v. Rodney Bonner, Jr., Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Marpco, Inc. v. South States Pipe & Supply, (La.App.
  • Cannata v. Bonner 982 So. 2d 968 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Marpco, Inc. v. South States Pipe & Supply, (La.
  • Brouillette v. Ducote 674 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    See also Marpco, Inc. v. South States Pipe & Supply, (La.App.
  • Rainone v. Exxon Corp. 654 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    Marpco, Inc. v. South States Pipe & Supply, (La.App.
  • Moity v. New Iberia Bank 612 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • Austin v. Bearden 566 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    In the case of Marpco, Inc. v. South States Pipe & Supply, (La.App.
  • Diggs v. Tyler 525 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    2d Cir.), writ denied, (1984); Marpco, Inc. v. South States Pipe & Supply, (La.App.
  • Every v. City of New Orleans 514 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    1984); Marpco, Inc. v. South States Pipe & Supply, (La.App.
  • Green v. Gary Memorial Hospital 505 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    Counsel for appellant relies on Marpco, Inc. v. South States Pipe & Supply, (La.App.
  • State v. Salgologo 491 So. 2d 361 La. 1986
    [4] While it is hornbook law the knowledge of the agent is imputed to the principal, see for example Marpco, Inc. v. South States Pipe & Supply, (La.App.
  • Hall v. Doctor's Hosp. of Tioga 486 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    Marpco, Inc. v. South States Pipe & Supply, (La.App.
  • Hebert v. Big Chief Truck Lines, Inc. 484 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Marpco, Inc. v. South States Pipe & Supply et al, (La.App.
  • Katz v. Melancon 467 So. 2d 1284 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    As authority for granting a continuance, defendant cites Marpco, (La.App.
  • Distinguished Sands v. STATE, THROUGH LA STATE MED. CENTER, SCH. OF DENTISTRY 458 So. 2d 960 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    Plaintiff's appellate counsel cites Marpco, Inc. v. South States Pipe & S., (La.App.
  • Halley v. Halley 457 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    Marpco, Inc. v. South States Pipe & Supply, (La.App.
  • Nola v. Ramsay 438 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Marpco, Inc. v. South States Pipe & Supply, (La.App.
  • Ouachita Equipment Rental Co. v. Trainer 408 So. 2d 930 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
    Marpco, Inc. v. South States Pipe & Supply, (La.App.
  • Richardson v. Stan Weber & Associates, Inc. 400 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    752 , (1943); Marpco, Inc. v. South States Pipe & Supply et al., (La.App.