Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Boudreaux v. Allstate Finance Corporation, 217 So. 2d 439.

20 citing documents.

Smart Document Solutions, LLC v. Miller 970 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Smart Document Solutions, LLC v. Michael B. Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Jimmie Hairford and Wayne Hairford v. Centurytel, Inc. & Centurytel of Central Louisiana, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Hairford v. Centurytel, Inc. 856 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Griffin v. BSFI WESTERN E & P, INC. 812 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
854, 862, 865, and 2164; (La.App.
Cadle Co. v. Hobbs 673 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Sanders v. Spector 673 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Nicholson & Loup v. Carl E. Woodward 596 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
LeBlanc v. Adams 510 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Norris v. King 355 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
2 Cir. 1969) (the defendant sent a series of lettersno less than tento plaintiff's employer informing it of the status of its employee's debt; creditor telephoned the office of employer and requested assistance in the collection of the debt; agents of the defendant told plaintiff that they would have him fired from every job until he left town); (La.App.
Guidry v. Cheramie 345 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
In Re Salmon 318 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
4th Cir., 1970); (La.App.
Loyacano v. Continental Insurance Company 283 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
Pate v. Crescent Motors Exchange, Inc. 256 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
12:104(C) and Boudreaux v. Allstate Finance Corporation, La.App., ; and (2) under these circumstances the granting of a new trial constitutes an abuse of the discretion given the trial court by LSA-C.C.P.
Rasberry v. English 255 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
4th Cir., 1970); (La.App.
Wilton Jones Company v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 248 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
Courville v. B & B Engineering & Supply Co. 230 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Article 865 declares: “Every pleading shall be so construed as to do substantial justice.” This court declared in Boudreaux v. Allstate Finance Corporation, La.App., : “It is settled law that modern tendency is toward a liberal construction of pleadings since technical rules of pleading no longer obtain, the result being that all doubt be resolved in favor of the pleader to the end that substantial justice be achieved.
Booty v. American Finance Corp. of Shreveport 224 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1969
For a very complete discussion of the problem of invasion of the privacy of a debtor by a creditor's attempt to collect a debt through communications with the debtor's employer, we refer the reader to the case of Pack v. Wise, supra, and the later cases of Boudreaux v. Allstate Finance Corporation, La.App., (1st Cir., 1968); and Passman v. Commercial Credit Plan of Hammond, Inc., La.App., (1st Cir., 1969).
Everett v. Community Credit Co. of Scenic 224 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Moses v. American Security Bank of Ville Platte 222 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
1st Cir., ; State ex rel.