Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Shackleford v. Shackleford, 389 So. 2d 825.

13 citing documents.

Melancon v. Bergeron 598 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Boles v. Perry 558 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
In support of this argument, (La.App.
Hicks v. Hicks 488 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Dykes v. Dykes 488 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Barton v. Minton 484 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Hulin v. Hulin 479 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
For a discussion of “reformation” (La.App.
Clark v. Clark 467 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Bishop v. Bishop 457 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
3d Cir.1979), writ granted (remanded to trial court to determine whether best interest of children requires custody of mother or of father), writ denied, (La.App.
Peters v. Peters 449 So. 2d 1372 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Granger v. Ortego 434 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
2nd Cir.1980), writ den., no evidence of adulterous relationship; (La.App.
Vincent v. Vincent 420 So. 2d 1333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Shackleford v. Shackleford 411 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Bonner v. Bonner 408 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Fulco; Monsour, supra; writs denied