DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., 392 So. 2d 750.

17 citing documents.

  • Kraus v. Wheat 856 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Co., -83 (La.1986) (quoting Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., (La.App.
  • Explained Elevating Boats, Inc. v. St. Bernard Parish 795 So. 2d 1153 La. 2001
    Co., -83 (La.1986) (quoting Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., (La.App.
  • Cardinal Federal Sav. Bank v. Corporate Towers Partners, Ltd. 629 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    Karst, supra; Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., (La.App.
  • Sevier v. United States Fidelity & Guar. Co. 497 So. 2d 1380 La. 1986
    Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., (La.App.
  • Thibodeaux v. Stagg 460 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., et al., (La.App.
  • Ebey v. Dolphin Const. Co. 435 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., (La.
  • Karst v. Fryar 430 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., (La.App.
  • Butts on Behalf of Walker v. Butts 428 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
  • Devillier v. Devillier 417 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Accord: Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., (La.App.
  • Dunn v. Redman Homes, Inc. 411 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc., Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., (La.App.
  • Fenetz v. Stine 407 So. 2d 1381 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc., Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., (La.App.
  • Hensley v. Miley 408 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc., Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., (La.App.
  • Babineaux v. Continental Oil Co. 407 So. 2d 1323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    We conclude that lay evidence must be weighed with consideration for the medical fact to be established, of the conclusiveness and validity of the medical evidence and the materiality, relevance and reliability of the particular lay evidence, according to its focus, foundation and its source.” Further, our court in Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., (La.App.
  • Joseph v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 406 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc.
  • Guillory v. Texas Petro Gas Co. 405 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    The reason for this well-settled principle of review is based not only upon the trial court’s better capacity to evaluate live witnesses (as compared with the appellate court’s access only to a cold record), but also upon the proper allocation of trial and appellate functions between the respective courts.” Accord: Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., (La.App.
  • Hickman v. Miller 405 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Aleman v. Lionel F. Favret Co., Inc., Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc., Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., Johnson v. Coca Cola Bottling Co., Inc.
  • Cormier v. Foremost Ins. Co. 405 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    1973); Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, Inc., (La.App.