Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Harper v. Brown & Root, Inc., 391 So. 2d 1170.
-
Miceli v. Riso
839 So. 2d 141
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
Harper v. Brown & Root, Inc., , 1173 n. 5 (La.1980).
-
Wilkinson v. Air Logistics
762 So. 2d 1169
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
See and compare Harper v. Brown & Root, Inc.
-
Alpha Alpha, Inc. v. Southland Aviation
697 So. 2d 1364
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Code art. 2926; Harper v. Brown & Root, Inc.
-
Northern Assurance Co. of America v. Cotton
658 So. 2d 246
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
2926 and 2928; Harper v. Brown & Root, Inc., on remand
-
Polk Chevrolet, Inc. v. Webb
572 So. 2d 1112
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
2926 and 2928; Harper v. Brown & Root, Inc., Coe Oil Service, (La.App.
-
Polk Chevrolet, Inc. v. Webb
572 So. 2d 1112
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
2926 and 2928; Harper v. Brown & Root, Inc., Coe Oil Service, (La.
-
Simmons v. Yelverton
513 So. 2d 504
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Art. 2926 and 2928; Harper v. Brown & Root, Inc., on remand (La.App.
-
Walker v. Self Service Storage and Miniwarehouses, Inc.
492 So. 2d 210
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Harper v. Brown & Root, Inc., (La.
-
Tauzier v. A. Giambelluca Construction, Inc.
467 So. 2d 1353
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Coe; and Harper v. Brown & Root, Inc., et al
-
Hornsby v. Richard
460 So. 2d 735
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Harper v. Brown & Root, Inc.
-
Aetna Life and Cas. v. O'Brien
440 So. 2d 966
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Harper v. *969 Brown & Root, Inc., (La.
-
Schlink v. Tenneco Oil Co.
439 So. 2d 1123
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
The latter circumstances were held to constitute the employer a depositary in Harper v. Brown & Root, Inc.
-
Collins v. Wright
412 So. 2d 659
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
See also Harper v. Brown & Root, Inc., La.
-
Mercer v. Columbia Equipment Co., Inc.
409 So. 2d 1285
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
In his written opinion, relying upon the recent case of Harper v. Brown & Root, Inc., the trial judge found a contract of deposit had been established between the parties; the property in question was lost while deposited; and defendant did not rebut the legal presumption that the loss resulted from the depositary's lack of care.
- Harper v. Brown & Root, Inc. 398 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981