DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., 393 So. 2d 1248.

76 citing documents.

  • Hanks v. CRC Holston, Inc. 430 So. 2d 1340 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    A review of the jurisprudence shows that the Supreme Court in the case of Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., ruled that a petition seeking a letter of financial responsibility states a cause of action under the workmen's compensation laws.
  • Lewis v. Rapides Parish School Board 430 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Wilson v. Ebasco, Services, Inc., Whitaker v. Church’s Fried Chicken, Inc.
  • Beauclair v. Rockwood Insurance 430 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., Dusang v. Henry C. Beck Builders, Inc., Whitaker v. Church's Fried Chicken, Inc., ” (La.App.
  • Heath v. Goldrus Drilling Co. 429 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., 42 La.L.Rev.
  • Fancher v. Overhead Doors, Inc. 425 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Comparing the facts and circumstances of this proceeding with Oster v. Wetzel Printing, Inc., Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., and other “odd lot” and “working in pain” decisions, we cannot say that the appealed-from judgment was clearly erroneous in any respect, and we affirm it.
  • Bates v. International Paper Co. 424 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    23:1221(2); Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc.
  • Brown v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc. 422 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc.
  • Henson v. Handee Corp. 421 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
    Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc.
  • Comeaux v. Cameron Offshore Services, Inc. 420 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    1981); Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., Dusang v. Henry C. Beck Builders, Inc., Whitaker v. Church's Fried Chicken, Inc.
  • Daney v. Argonaut Ins. Co. 421 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    23:1221(1) and (2); Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., Smith v. State, Department of Highways, (La.App.
  • Bazile v. Pellerin Milnor Corp. 433 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    A worker who cannot return to gainful employment without suffering substantial pain is entitled to compensation benefits for total disability, and, the “Odd Lot” is also applicable to substantial pain cases because a worker who, due to injury, can function only with substantial pain may not be considered a desirable worker: [690]; .
  • Walgamotte v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc. 420 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    as a result of a compensable injury, he is rendered unable to perform any service for which a reasonably dependable market exists.” Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., at 1252.
  • Jackson v. Maloney Trucking & Storage, Inc. 424 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc.
  • Culp v. Belden Corp. 416 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    Wilson Ebasco Services, Inc.
  • Bordelon v. Ranger Ins. Co. 413 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., Dusang v. Henry C. Beck Builders, Inc., Whitaker v. Church's Fried Chicken, Inc.
  • Crockett v. St. Paul Ins. Co. 413 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    4 Cir. 1978); see also Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.
  • Lopez v. Sid Oden & Co. 411 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Inc., because this is a case in which plaintiff’s pain prevents his stable employment in the only kind of work for which he is presently fit, there must be an award for total and permanent disability that leaves open to defendant the right to seek modification under La.R.S.
  • Vernon v. Aetna Life & Casualty Insurance 409 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., Whitaker v. Church’s Fried Chicken, Inc.
  • Augustine v. COURTNEY CONST. CO., ETC. 405 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., Dusang v. Henry C. Beck Builders, Inc., Whitaker v. Church's Fried Chicken, Inc.
  • Cottonham v. Rockwood Ins. Co. 403 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    1980); Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc.
  • Reliford v. Dobson Pulpwood Co. 401 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., Dusang v. Henry C. Beck Builders, Inc., Whitaker v. Church’s Fried Chicken, Inc.
  • Lastrapes v. CNA Ins. Co. 401 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., Dusang v. Henry C. Beck Builders, Inc., Whitaker v. Church's Fried Chicken, Inc.
  • Kinsey v. Travelers Ins. Co., Inc. 402 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.
  • Taintor v. Standard Supply & Hardware Co. 398 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    In Wilson v. Ebasco Service, Inc., (La.
  • Lee v. Pratt-Farnsworth Construction Co. 397 So. 2d 2 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    and Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., in which the court expounded on and applied the “odd-lot” doctrine.
  • Lattin v. Hica Corp. 395 So. 2d 690 La. 1981
    Wilson v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.