Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jenkins v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office, 402 So. 2d 669.
-
Williams v. Stewart
46 So. 3d 266
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Riley, supra; Jenkins v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office
-
Bussey v. Dillard Dept. Stores, Inc.
984 So. 2d 781
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Duplantis v. Dillard's Department Store, XXXX-XXXX, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
- Gullette v. Caldwell Parish Police Jury 765 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
-
Bell v. Crump
651 So. 2d 975
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
See also, Jenkins v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office, -72 (La.1981).
- Riley v. EVANGELINE PARISH SHERIFF'S OFF. 637 So. 2d 395 La. 1994
-
Ferguson v. Stephens
623 So. 2d 711
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
4th Cir.1980), reversed in part on other grounds
- Langley v. City of Monroe 582 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
-
Parker v. Southern American Ins. Co.
578 So. 2d 1021
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
1st Cir. 1981), writ not considered, writ denied as to failure to consider original writ application, (La.
- Toefield v. State 546 So. 2d 162 La. 1989
- Robin v. Galan 545 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
-
Nall v. Parish of Iberville
542 So. 2d 145
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
(footnote omitted) the Supreme Court re-examined the issue of vicarious liability for torts committed by deputy sheriffs in light of Act 318.
-
Cooley v. State
533 So. 2d 124
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
the Louisiana Supreme Court examined La.R.S.
- Bulot v. Justice 524 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
-
Wong v. East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff's Office
522 So. 2d 1134
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
4th Cir. 1980), reversed in part on other grounds, (La.
-
Vance v. Orleans Parish Criminal Sheriff's Department
483 So. 2d 1178
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
however, the Supreme Court reexamined the prior holdings in Foster v. Hampton, and held that a parish sheriff, as the employer of his deputy, can be held liable for the deputy’s torts in the course and scope of employment.
-
Sullivan v. Quick
465 So. 2d 254
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Bourque v. Lohr, supra, and cases cited therein.
-
Kahl v. Baudoin
449 So. 2d 1334
La. 1984
considered this legislation's effect on delictual responsibility for the torts of a deputy sheriff and held that the sheriff was responsible in his official capacity because of the employment relationship between a sheriff and his deputies.
- Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light 433 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
-
Sciortino v. Alfano
435 So. 2d 1010
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
the Supreme Court of Louisiana stated: "No one but the sheriff can realistically be viewed as the employer of deputies."
- Duvernay v. ST. THROUGH DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY 433 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Pellegal v. Dureau 427 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
- Brodnax v. Cappel 425 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
-
Sullivan v. Quick
406 So. 2d 284
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
This issue has recently been decided by the Louisiana Supreme Court, with *285 three dissents, (La.