Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hebert v. Brazzel, 403 So. 2d 1242.

49 citing documents.

Del Dean David, Et Ux. v. Velsicol Chemical Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Susan and Edward L. Wilhelm v. Mosaic Global Operations, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
David v. Velsicol Chem. Corp. 49 So. 3d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
DeBattista v. Argonaut-Southwest Ins.
Cherie Benjamin v. First Horizon Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Likewise, the court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish that a valve was defectively manufactured, that the valve stem was probably broken by excessive torque and not due to an internal weakness, and that an ordinary oil field worker would have appreciated the danger involved in greatly multiplying the t
Benjamin v. First Horizon Ins. Co. 978 So. 2d 1121 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Likewise, the court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish that a valve was defectively manufactured, that the valve stem was probably broken by excessive torque and not due to an internal weakness, and that an ordinary oil field worker would have appreciated the danger involved in greatly multiplying the torqu
Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc. 726 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Bell v. Jet Wheel Blast, Division of Ervin Industries
Hines v. Remington Arms Co., Inc. 648 So. 2d 331 La. 1994
Co., Chappuis v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
Goins v. Galion Mfg. Co. 626 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Chappuis v. Sears Roebuck & Co., Weber v. Fidelity Casualty Insurance Co. of New York, 259 La.
Simeon v. Doe 618 So. 2d 848 La. 1993
Sunlake Apartment Residents v. Tonti Development Corp. 602 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
of La., (4th Cir.1989), writ denied ; (3rd Cir.1980), affirmed .
Home Insurance Co. v. National Tea Co. 577 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
DeBattista v. Argonaut-Southwest Ins.
Brantley v. General Motors Corp. 573 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Reilly v. Dynamic Exploration, Inc. 571 So. 2d 140 La. 1990
DeBattista v. Argonaut-Southwest Ins.
Hopper v. Crown 555 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
4th Cir.1979); see also, (La.App.
Leday v. Aztec Corp. 544 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Keeton, The Meaning of Defect, supra, p. 592; Cf. Hebert v. Brazzel [ (La.
Purvis v. American Motors Corp. 538 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
AMC next argues that it was error to admit into evidence a film of Jeep rollovers produced by Dynamic Science, (La.
Antley v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA 539 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
DeBattista v. Argonaut-Southwest Ins.
Prather v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., Inc. 526 So. 2d 1325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
DeBattista v. Argonaut-Southwest Ins.
Felice v. Valleylab, Inc. 520 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Halphen, supra; Weber, supra; see, generally, Prosser & Keeton on Torts § 41, Twerski, Seizing the Middle Ground, 57 N.Y.U.L.Rev.
Safeco Ins. Co. v. Baker 515 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Halphen [ v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., ], supra; Weber [ v. Fidelity & Casualty Ins.
Bloxom v. Bloxom 512 So. 2d 839 La. 1987
Halphen, supra; Weber, supra; see, generally, Prosser & Keeton on Torts § 41; Twerski, Seizing the Middle Ground, 57 N.Y.U.L.Rev.
Ingram v. Caterpillar Machinery Corp. 510 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Toups v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., Inc. 507 So. 2d 809 La. 1987
Whittle v. MILLER ELECTRICAL MFG. CO. 507 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
DeBattista v. Argonaut-Southwest Ins.
LeBleu v. Homelite Div. of Textron, Inc. 509 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
DeBattista v. Argonaut-Southwest Ins.
Rhoto v. Ribando 504 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Chappuis v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
Tyler v. Natchitoches Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 491 So. 2d 358 La. 1986
Thompson v. Tuggle 486 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Halphen v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. 484 So. 2d 110 La. 1986
DeBattista v. Argonaut-Southwest Ins.
Scott v. Terrebonne Lumber Co. 479 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Anthony v. Hospital Service Dist. No. 1 477 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
3d Cir.1980), writ granted, aff'd
Aaron v. BANKERS AND SHIPPERS INS. CO. OF NY 475 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
3d Cir.1980), writ granted, , aff'd, .
Lanclos v. Rockwell Intern. Corp. 470 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Bell v. Jet Wheel Blast, Div. of Ervin Industries 462 So. 2d 166 La. 1985
DeBattista v. Argonaut-Southwest Ins.
Cutchall v. Great American Pump Co. 460 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Winterrowd v. Travelers Indem. Co. 452 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Chappuis v. Sears Roebuck & Co., (La.App.
Quattlebaum v. Hy-Reach Equipment Inc. 453 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
the court adopted the Weber statement of the law and observed that a product is unreasonably dangerous (defective) when it is dangerous to an extent beyond that which would be contemplated by an ordinary consumer or user.
LeRay v. St. Paul Fire and Marine 444 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Jones v. PK Smith Chevrolet-Olds, Inc. 444 So. 2d 1372 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Lytell v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 439 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
LoBrono v. Gene Ducote Volkswagen, Inc., (La.
Pawlak v. Brown 430 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Benoit v. Ryan Chevrolet 428 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Chappuis v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
O'BRIEN v. Delta Gas, Inc. 426 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Chappuis v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
Lovell v. Earl Grissmer Co., Inc. 422 So. 2d 1344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Baronet v. Mobil Chemical Corp. 422 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Company of N.Y., 259 La.
McElroy v. Allstate Ins. Co. 420 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Both appellee and appellants cite in support of their respective positions
Braxton v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. 419 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
McLeod v. Parish of East Baton Rouge 414 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
App.3rd Cir. 1980), affirmed the Third Circuit stated that an employee of a party may qualify as an expert, although his credibility may be diminished under the circumstances, citing La.C.C.
Molenaar v. McGILL MFG. CO., INC. 410 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
wherein the principles of Weber are reaffirmed, with the following additional comment: "A manufacturer must give warning of any danger inherent in this product's normal use which is not within the knowledge of an ordinary user."