Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Patton v. Silvey Companies, 395 So. 2d 722.

16 citing documents.

Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist. 836 So. 2d 14 La. 2003
Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc. 721 So. 2d 885 La. 1998
See, Crawford v. Al Smith Plumbing & Heating Service, Inc., Guillory v. Travelers Ins.
Dupree v. Ace Home & Auto 685 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
the supreme court offered the following warning: There is nowhere in the jurisprudence authority for an employer to rely on a treating physician’s prognosis, by its very nature an equivocal statement of the claimant’s future condition.
Belt v. STATE EX REL. LA. BD. OF COSMETOLOGY, COMMERCE DEPT. 493 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Dearmon v. Louisiana Pacific Corp. 465 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
See: Walker v. Gaines P. Wilson & Son, Inc., Alexander v. Department of Culture, Etc., (La.App.
Matherne v. Livingston Parish Police Jury 463 So. 2d 1361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
23:1314 provides that in an employee’s compensation suit an exception of prematurity shall be determined by the court before proceeding with the hearing of the other issues involved, [emphasis added]
Romero v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 452 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
in discussing the exception of prematurity pursuant to R.S.
McMillan v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 448 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
the court interpreted the provision “justification under the facts” contained in R.S.
Lennix v. St. Charles Grain Elevator Co. 439 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Deters v. Commercial Union Insurance Co. 434 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Fazande v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 430 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Harris v. Louisiana Paving Co., Inc. 427 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Williams v. Pickett Food Service, Inc. 419 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Guillory v. US Fidelity & Guar. Ins. Co. 420 So. 2d 119 La. 1982
Duncan v. Rockwood Insurance 401 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Additionally, however, and even if we found, as the trial court did, that the defendant-appellee was not arbitrary and capricious in offering less than that which was ultimately awarded
Fredericks v. Associated Indem. Corp. 401 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981