Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bond v. Commercial Union Assur. Co., 407 So. 2d 401.

109 citing documents.

Morvant v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co. 538 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Niemann v. Travelers Ins.
Pareti v. Sentry Indem. Co. 536 So. 2d 417 La. 1988
and Niemann v. Travelers Ins.
Bauer v. White 532 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Babineaux v. Domingue 529 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Clark v. Harris 522 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Co., -08 (La.1981) on remand (1982) wherein the court stated: The insurance policy's definition of an insured includes any blood relative of the named insured "who is a resident of the same household."
Bosch v. Cummings 520 So. 2d 721 La. 1988
Smith v. Manville Forest Products Corp. 521 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Edmonds v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. 508 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Barras v. Benoit 509 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Co., Benton Casing Service
Jenks v. State 507 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Cochran Ford, Inc. v. Copeland 499 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
3d Cir. 1980), modified, (La.App.
Wallace v. Aetna Life & Cas. Ins. Co. 499 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Aucoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 499 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Co., the court held as follows: "The legislative aim evinced by the original uninsured motorist statute was to afford protection to insureds when they became the innocent victims of the negligence of uninsured motorists.
Gaspard v. Jefferson Ins. Co. of New York 488 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Moncrief v. Panepinto 489 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
The Supreme Court, at page 408, said: "The major question of law in this case is whether an insurer that makes payment to its insured under uninsured motorist coverage may enforce a conventional subrogation agreement contained in its policy.
Stephens Co. v. Keigley 487 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
3d Cir. 1980), this court explained: "The party successful at the trial level cannot appeal the judgment to the Court of Appeal.
State v. Reliance Ins. Co. 487 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Art. 1828, 1829; Cox v. W.M.
Francois v. Ybarzabal 483 So. 2d 602 La. 1986
3rd Cir.,1980), affirmed on other grounds, (La.App.
Varnado v. Insurance Corp. of America 484 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Cooper v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. 481 So. 2d 611 La. 1986
Shatoska v. Whiddon 468 So. 2d 1314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Nelson v. Allstate Ins. Co. 464 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Standard also argues a provision in its policy allows payment to be contingent on the execution of a right of subrogation by its insured, which authorized subrogation solely on the policy provisions was not decided until after the incident occurred.
Jordan v. Sweeney 467 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Co., ], supra; Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins.
Jilek v. Covert 465 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Fertitta v. Allstate Ins. Co. 462 So. 2d 159 La. 1985
Co., which held that the uninsured motorist carrier who pays part of the victim's damages receives a partial, subordinate subrogation under La.C.C.
Knight v. Soilemisis 461 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Co., ]; Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins., Co.
Carona v. State Farm Ins. Co. 458 So. 2d 1275 La. 1984
Nida v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 454 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Co., Benton Casing Service, Inc. v. Avemco, Ins.
Roy v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. 453 So. 2d 564 La. 1984
(On Rehearing) wherein all claims were litigated and no releases granted, and we found that the defendant/third party/plaintiff/UMI carrier was entitled to judgment against the tortfeasor because of a conventional subrogation in its policy.
Rogers v. Ambassador Ins. Co. 452 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Pique v. Saia 450 So. 2d 654 La. 1984
Co., Benton Casing Service, Inc. v. Avemco, Ins.
Wheelahan v. Eller 446 So. 2d 442 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Great Atlantic Ins. v. MARTIN SERVICES INTERN. 445 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Co., Commercial Capital Systems, (1st Cir.1976); Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., (1st Cir.), writ granted
Taylor v. Tanner 442 So. 2d 435 La. 1983
Audubon Insurance Co. v. Farr 443 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Kemp v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 442 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Appellant, in his brief, and Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 248 La.
Reed v. Gulf Ins. Co. 436 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
3d Cir.1980), writ granted, , aff'd, (La.
LAKE CHARLES MEMORIAL HOSP. v. Sinegal 440 So. 2d 1358 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
3rd Cir.1980), reversed in part on other grounds
Bearden v. Rucker 437 So. 2d 1116 La. 1983
Cane River Shopping Center v. Monsour 443 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
3rd Cir. 1980); affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded on other grounds
Block v. Reliance Ins. Co. 433 So. 2d 1040 La. 1983
Stroud v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 429 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Ainsworth v. Government Employees Ins. Co. 427 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Johnson v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 425 So. 2d 224 La. 1983
Niemann v. Travelers Ins.
Chiasson v. Whitney 427 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Co., (on rehearing) and the general articles on subrogation in the La.
Brown v. Yasso 424 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Blue Ridge Insurance v. Newman 423 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Simon v. Allstate Insurance Co. 422 So. 2d 1323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Hudson v. Thompson 422 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Reliance Ins. Co. v. Tadlock 420 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Co., the Supreme Court closely examined subrogation rights under the uninsured motorist statute.