Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite White v. McCool, 395 So. 2d 774.

28 citing documents.

Roxine Lachney v. James L. Gates, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Genevieve Moore v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agriculture and Mechanical College O/B/O Lsu Health … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
Howard v. Vincent 88 So. 3d 1219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Ruiz v. Guette 983 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
2 Cir. 3/1/96), , 739-40, ( citing, (La.App.
Cascio v. Downing 957 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
2 Cir. 3/1/96), -40 , ( ); La.Rev.Stat.
MERVIN PRIMEAUX, Indiv. and ELIZABETH PRIMEAUX, Indiv. VERSUS ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INS. CO. & DR. RICHARD … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Primeaux v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 862 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
2 Cir. 3/1/96), ; writ denied, 96-1038 (La.5/31/96), ] ().
Fusilier v. Dauterive 764 So. 2d 74 La. 2000
Hughes v. Bailey 691 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
James v. Gordon 690 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Denton v. Critikon, Inc. 674 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
[7] the supreme court stated if "the accident might have happened as the result of one of two causes, the reason for the [doctrine of res ipsa] fails and it can not be invoked."
Gordon v. Louisiana State University Board of Supervisors 669 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
9:2794 places upon the medical malpractice plaintiff the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence (1) that the doctor’s treatment fell below the standard of care expected of a physician in his medical specialty, and (2) the existence of a causal relationship between the alleged *740 negligent treatment and the injury sustained, (La.App.
Gordon v. LSU BD. OF SUP'RS 669 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Russo v. Bratton 657 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Elliott v. Robinson 612 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Tedeton v. Coffman 544 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Ogletree v. Willis-Knighton Memorial Hosp., Inc. 530 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Smith v. State Through Dept. HHR 523 So. 2d 815 La. 1988
Stephens v. DeLoach 522 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Carter v. Louisiana State University 520 So. 2d 383 La. 1988
Smith v. State Through Dept. of HHR 517 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
McCann v. Baton Rouge General Hospital, 276 So.
Bergeron v. Houma Hosp. Corp. 514 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
at 777 (La.1981), quoting Larkin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson and Davis Clinic 514 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Frasier v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN 500 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Steinbach v. Barfield 428 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
9:2794 [2] as follows: "The pertinent statutory provision, enacted in 1975, places upon the plaintiff in a medical malpractice action the burden of proving `the degree of care ordinarily practiced by physicians and dentists within the involved medical specialty,' R.S.
Trichel v. Caire 427 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Rogers v. Brown 416 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Zeno v. Lincoln General Hospital 404 So. 2d 1337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
the supreme court explained the burden of proof of a plaintiff in a malpractice case and the circumstances where the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable to a malpractice action.