DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc., 396 So. 2d 1261.

31 citing documents.

  • Williams v. Three Girls, L.L.C. 142 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc.
  • Simon v. Hillensbeck 100 So. 3d 946 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc., At the time of Antonio’s accident, La.
  • Greely v. OAG PROPERTIES, LLC 12 So. 3d 490 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc., (La.
  • Laura's Products, Inc. v. 600 Conti Street 982 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Rev. Stat Ann. § 9:3221 (2001)
  • Allstate Ins. Co. v. Veninata 971 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc.
  • Ford New Holland Credit Co. v. McManus 833 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc., Louisiana National Leasing Corporation v. ADF Service, Inc., Walnut Equipment Leasing Co., Inc., supra.
  • Corbello v. Iowa Production 806 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc.
  • Ford v. Bienvenu 804 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    2d 846 (tenant assumed responsibility for the condition of the property including all vices or defects, but owner/lessor not let out on summary judgment because genuine issue of material facts existed as to whether owner/lessor "should have known" of defects and whether fire originated in the premises that tenant contractually assumed responsibility for); and Tassin v. Slidell Mini Storage, Inc., (even though lessees assumed responsibility for water damage caused by vice or defect in the premise
  • O'NEILL v. Thibodeaux 709 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    See also Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc.
  • Carriere v. Bank of Louisiana 702 So. 2d 648 La. 1997
    Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc., see also T.D.
  • Earhart v. Brown 702 So. 2d 976 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc.
  • US Fidelity and Guar. Co. v. Hurley 698 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc., (La.
  • GEO CONSULTANTS INTERNATIONAL v. Professional Roofing and Const., Inc. 672 So. 2d 1002 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    12/8/94) ; Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc.
  • Edenborn Partners Ltd. Partnership v. Korndorffer 652 So. 2d 1027 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc.
  • Stelly v. Overhead Door Co. of BR 646 So. 2d 905 La. 1994
    See also Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc.
  • WALNUT EQUIPMENT LEASING v. Moreno 643 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc., Louisiana National Leasing Corporation v. ADF Service, Inc., (La.App.
  • Reynolds v. Select Properties, Ltd. 634 So. 2d 1180 La. 1994
  • Guillory v. Foster 634 So. 2d 1372 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc., (Orl.1946); and Paul v. Nolen, 166 So.
  • Muse v. Katz 632 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    9:3221 in Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc., found a lessor liable for damage sustained by a tenant, notwithstanding a provision in the lease exculpating the lessor from liability.
  • Bostick v. Wood 620 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
    Furthermore, we have followed Tassin v. Slidell Mini Storage, Inc., by holding: Where there is a conflict between the general law of lease and the terms of the contract, the contract should prevail unless the rights of others are affected or the result would be contrary to the public good.
  • Gulf American Industries v. Airco Indus. Gases 573 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
  • Moore v. Cameron Parish School Bd. 563 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    Nevertheless, in Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc., (La.
  • Versailles Arms Apartments v. Pete 545 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    art. 1983; Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc., General Leasing Co. v. Leda Towing Co., Inc., (La.
  • Pace v. Loyal Order of Moose, Metairie Lodge 2195 538 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    Tassin v. Slidell Mini Storage, Inc.
  • Andrus v. Cajun Insulation Co. 524 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    where a lessor was held liable for damages sustained by the lessee as a result of water *1243 entering a mini storage warehouse, despite the waiver of warranty; the Court held that the lessor knew or should have known of the defects in construction; in Brunies v. Police Jury of Parish of Jefferson, 237 La.
  • Ostrander v. Parkland Villa Apartments 511 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc., (La.App.
  • Coates v. Northlake Oil Co., Inc. 499 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Davis v. A Copeland Enterprises, (La.App.
  • Pylate v. Inabnet 458 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc.
  • St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. French Eighth 457 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    The Louisiana Supreme Court considered a similar situation in Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc.
  • Calderon v. Johnson 453 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Tassin v. Slidell *618 Mini Storage, Inc.
  • Walsh Filter Co. v. Rice 439 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Finally defendants cite Davis v. Copeland Enterprises, Inc., and Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc., where the Supreme Court has recognized the validity of lease exculpatory clauses in which the lessor is relieved of responsibility for any damages, except in the case of positive neglect or failure to remedy the defects within a reasonable time “after having received written notice from lessee” of the defec