Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dorry v. LaFleur, 399 So. 2d 559.
- Miller v. Broussard 430 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- Gordon v. City of New Orleans 430 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
-
Brown v. White
430 So. 2d 16
La. 1983
1067 , seems to support the argument that contributory negligence is not a defense to a strict liability cause of action
-
Hills v. Skate Country East, Inc.
430 So. 2d 1035
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Second, the court rejected the notion that the doctrine of assumption of risk applies to those which plaintiff should know about and limited its application to those risks of which plaintiff had actual knowledge.
- Buchanan v. Tangipahoa Parish Police Jury 426 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Payne v. LOUISIANA DEPT. OF TRANSP., ETC. 424 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
Lovell v. Earl Grissmer Co., Inc.
422 So. 2d 1344
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
She contends that the deceased did not voluntarily expose himself to a danger which he fully understood and appreciated
-
Deville v. CALCASIEU GRAVITY, ETC.
422 So. 2d 631
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
for a decision by a very much divided Louisiana Supreme Court, where a plurality of the Justices, including a Justice Ad Hoc, held that contributory negligence may indeed be a defense, perhaps under the guise of "victim fault" in strict liability cases.
- Falgout v. Wardlaw 423 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
-
Naylor v. La. Dept. of Public Highways
423 So. 2d 674
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
a plaintiff does not assume a risk of harm unless he knows of the existence of the risk and appreciates its unreasonable character.
-
Williams v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
421 So. 2d 278
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
the court observed: "Under what circumstances a plaintiff's contributory negligence should bar his recovery in a strict liability case should be developed on a case by case basis," and rejected contributory negligence as a legitimate defense to the claim in that particular case.
-
Schaeffer v. Duvall
421 So. 2d 262
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Stewart v. Sam Wallace Indus.
- Sumner v. Foremost Ins. Co. 417 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
- Verrett v. Cameron Telephone Co. 417 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
- Kent v. Gulf States Utilities Co. 418 So. 2d 493 La. 1982
- Entrevia v. Hood 413 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Holman v. Reliance Ins. Cos. 414 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
-
Walker v. James W. Salley, Inc.
412 So. 2d 159
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Mrs. Walker also contends that contributory negligence (victim fault) is no longer a defense to a 2317
-
Flair v. Bd. of Com'rs of Orleans Levee Bd.
411 So. 2d 614
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
However, in the recent case of Dorry v. Lafleur, La., , at pages 560 and 561, the Supreme Court made the following pronouncement: "Where a plaintiff's negligence contributes to his own damage, there is no reason to ignore his fault in every case simply because the defendant's liability is based on some legal fault other than negligence.
- Carpenter v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 411 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
- Carter v. City Parish Government of East Baton Rouge 409 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
-
Goldberg v. Ruckstuhl
408 So. 2d 374
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
the risk must be knowingly assumed, and the knowledge is subjective.
-
Stewart v. Sam Wallace Indus. Co.
409 So. 2d 335
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Fonseca v. Marlin Marine Corporation, ___ So.2d ___, No. 80-C-1522, Supreme Court, March 2, 1981.
- Kaplan v. Missouri Pacific R. Co. 409 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
-
Creamer v. Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
405 So. 2d 651
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
a case factually similar to the one before us, Tim's lack of actual knowledge of the puddle precludes a finding that he assumed the risk of injury unless it can be shown that he must have known or been aware of the puddle which caused his fall.
-
DeBattista v. Argonaut-Southwest Ins. Co.
403 So. 2d 26
La. 1981
Chappuis v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
- Jackson v. Tri-State Elevator Co., Inc. 401 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
-
Morgan v. Hartford Acc. and Indem. Co.
402 So. 2d 640
La. 1981
[3] The question of whether contributory negligence can serve as a defense in a and answered affirmatively in a plurality opinion.