Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Curtis v. Curtis, 403 So. 2d 56.

49 citing documents.

Noel W. Yates v. Lisa J. Yates La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Elizabeth B. Downey v. Kenneth A. Downey La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Baron T. Drayton v. Segen Mesmer-Drayton La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
Larry Sylvester Cola, Jr. v. Tonya Leatherman Cola La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Maxwell v. Maxwell 217 So. 3d 1227 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Bulloch v. Bulloch 214 So. 3d 930 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
App. 2 Cir. 11/18/15), ; (La.
In re Succession of Dysart 206 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Fulco v. Fulco 183 So. 3d 573 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
When separate and community funds are deposited into one bank account, this fact does not convert the entire account into community property, “Only when separate funds are commingled with community fends indiscriminately so that the separate funds eannot be identified or differentiated from the community funds , are all of the funds characterized as community funds.” Thomson v. Thomson, supra.
In Re Succession of Firmin 38 So. 3d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Etter v. Johnston 966 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Succession of Andrew M. Moore La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Succession of Moore 946 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Robert v. Robert 936 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Talbot v. Talbot 864 So. 2d 590 La. 2003
Curtis, see also, K. Spaht, Developments in the Law, 1980-1981 Matrimonial Regimes, 42 La.
Sharp v. Sharp 830 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Biondo v. Biondo 769 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Brehm v. Brehm 762 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Granger v. Granger 722 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
the Supreme Court held: We have stated in cases involving bank accounts that the mere mixing of separate funds and community funds in the same account does not itself convert an entire account into community property; only when separate funds are commingled with community funds indiscriminately so that the
Purcell v. Purcell 697 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Gautreau v. Gautreau 697 So. 2d 1339 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
-59 (La.1981): While other community property states may categorize property paid for in part with separate funds and in part with community funds as mixed, Louisiana does not do so.
Ecroyd v. Ecroyd 682 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
the supreme court stated: We have stated in cases involving bank accounts that the mere mixing of separate funds and community funds in the same account does not of itself convert an entire account into community property; only when separate funds are commingled with community funds indiscriminately so t
Major v. Major 671 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Succession of Brewster 663 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
McMorris v. McMorris 654 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Hebert v. Hebert 650 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Callender v. Callender 625 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
60 (La.1981) the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "Where separate funds can be traced with sufficient certainty to establish the separate ownership of property paid for with those funds, the separate status of such property will be upheld."
Landry v. Landry 610 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Kyson v. Kyson 596 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Distinguished Hinckley v. Hinckley 583 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
However, the Louisiana Supreme Court reaffirmed the principle of Louisiana law that when separate and community funds, even though distinguishable and not commingled, are used in making up the consideration paid for property acquired during the existence of the community, the property so purchased becomes community
Thibodaux v. Thibodaux 577 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Allbritton v. Allbritton 561 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Martinez v. Martinez 556 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Dance v. Dance 552 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Bernardi v. Bernardi 551 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
“The party asserting the separate nature of the property acquired during the marriage has the burden of overcoming a strong presumption in favor of the community.” Tullier v. Tullier, 464 So.2d at 283
Young v. Young 549 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
*441 which held: "We have stated in cases involving bank accounts that the mere mixing of separate funds and community funds in the same account does not of itself convert an entire account into community property; only when separate funds are commingled with community funds indiscriminately so that the separate
Landwehr v. Landwehr 547 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "We have stated in cases involving bank accounts that the mere mixing of separate funds and community funds in the same account does not of itself convert an entire account into community property; only when separate funds are commingled with community funds indiscriminate
Burford v. Burford 541 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Tullier v. Tullier, supra
Ziegler v. Ziegler 537 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Succession of Davis 536 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Succession of Norwood v. Norwood 519 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Levatino v. Levatino 506 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Lee v. Manning 505 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Succession of Davis 496 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Lambert v. Lambert 480 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Campo v. Dupre 470 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
held that where separate and community funds are mixed or co-mingled indiscriminately so that separate funds cannot be identified or differentiated from community funds, all funds are characterized as community funds.
Tullier v. Tullier 464 So. 2d 278 La. 1985
Tullier v. Tullier 450 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Whatley v. Whatley 439 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Cooper v. Heirs of Cooper 421 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982