Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dixie Campers, Inc. v. Vesely Co., 398 So. 2d 1087.

102 citing documents.

Carlin v. Rapides Parish Police Jury 584 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
art. 966; Dixie Campers, (La.
Legros v. Norcen Exploration, Inc. 583 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Legros v. Norcen Exploration, Inc. 583 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Latiolais v. BFI of Louisiana, Inc. 567 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
In Dixie Campers, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "...
Cooper v. Olinde 565 So. 2d 978 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
2045 et seq.; Dixie Campers
Guidry v. Park Dell Terrace Partnership 561 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Trim v. South Eastern Express, Inc. 562 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Diefenthal v. Longue Vue Management Corp. 561 So. 2d 44 La. 1990
Garner v. Law 560 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Brown v. Rougon 552 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
2045 et seq.; Dixie Campers
Sizeler Property Investors, Inc. v. Gordon Jewelry Corp. 550 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Wilson v. Stone Container Corp. 548 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Louisiana Sav. Ass'n, Inc. v. BLUEBONNET HOLDING P'SHIP. 546 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Dixie Campers, Joseph v. Joseph, supra ; Baker v. Life General Security Insurance Company, supra ; Bohm v. CIT Financial Services, Inc., (La.App.
Caplan v. Pelican Homestead and Sav. Ass'n 542 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
In Dixie Campers, the Louisiana Supreme Court held: A motion for summary judgment is properly granted only if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to material fact, and that mover is entitled to judgment as
Lemke v. Amidon 542 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Borden, Inc. v. Gulf States Utilities Co. 543 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Holladay v. Dixie Broadcasters, Inc. 535 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Myers v. Myers 532 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
2045 et seq.; Dixie Campers
Stewart v. Graves 523 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Placid Refining Co. v. Privette 523 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
See also Dixie Campers, , (La.1981); (La.App.
Milliman v. Peterman 519 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
The Louisiana Supreme Court held in Dixie Campers, : [1] Although parol evidence is inadmissible to vary the terms of a written contract, La.C.C.
Collins v. Taylor 518 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
[citations omitted, footnote added] Dixie Campers
Cochran v. Riggins Heavy Hauling 516 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Art. 966; State, Dixie Campers, (La.App.
Daret v. Halmar Construction Co. 505 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
American Druggists Ins. Co. v. Henry Contracting, Inc. 505 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
The Louisiana rule on the admissibility of parol evidence was stated in Dixie Campers, at 1089 (La.1981), as follows: "Although parol evidence is inadmissible to vary the terms of a written contract, La.C.C.
Brown v. Mayfield 488 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
4th Cir.1976), Dixie Campers
Matherne v. Rise 479 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Dixie Campers, Tauzin v. Claitor, supra.
Hardware Wholesalers, Inc. v. Guilbeau 473 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Dixie Campers, Carter's Insurance Agency, (La.App.
Celt Oil, Inc. v. Jackson 469 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
TR Drilling Co., Inc. v. Howard 463 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
White v. Rimmer & Garrett, Inc., Dixie Campers, (La.
General Elec. Co. v. LA. ELEC. SUPPLY CO., INC. 460 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Thomas v. Knight 457 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
1847 et seq.; Dixie Campers
Laque v. St. Charles Parish 444 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Sally Beauty Co. v. Barney 442 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
4th Cir.1976), Dixie Campers
Ayers v. Kent 438 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Hampton v. Rubicon Chemicals, Inc. 436 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
art. 2276; and Dixie Campers
Quintana Petroleum Corp. v. Alpha Investments Corp. 435 So. 2d 1092 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Dixie Campers, Carter's Insurance Agency, (La.App.
Fallo v. Tuboscope Inspection, Intracoastal Pipe Repair & Supply Co. 435 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
they are guided by the Louisiana Civil Code which provides that the “motion for summary judgment is properly granted only if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to material fact, and that the mover is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Dixie Campers, Thornhill v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc., Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc., (Emphasis added) In this
Hebert v. Neyrey 432 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
1847 et seq.; Dixie Campers
Carter's Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Franklin 428 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Dixie Campers, Tauzin v. Claitor, supra .
Lauman v. Cavaretta's, Inc. 427 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
See Dixie Campers, White v. Dimmer & Garrett, Inc., Texhoma Contractors v. So.
Boudreaux v. Pipe Line Technologists, Inc. 426 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Henderson v. Administrators of Tulane Univ. 426 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Bacon v. Diamond Motors, Inc. 424 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
McClelland v. Security Indus. Ins. Co. 426 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Lindsay v. Opt, Inc. 423 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Thompson v. Brown & Root, Inc. 422 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
art. 966; Dixie Campers, (La.App.
Adams v. Times-Picayune Pub. Corp. 418 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Art. *687 966, Dixie Campers, (La.App.
Tauzin v. Claitor 417 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Sevin v. Gallois 416 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Dixie Campers, LSA-C.C.P.